Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06623812
NCT06623812
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Satiety Responses of Meals Consisting of Different Protein Sources

Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation0 sites50 target enrollmentOctober 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Healthy Male Adults Participants
Sponsor
Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation
Enrollment
50
Primary Endpoint
Post-Prandial Sensor Glucose Readings
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

This project aims to study the effects of different protein quality (i.e. high vs. low) and protein sources (i.e. plant protein vs. conventional animal protein) on post-meal satiety and satisfaction. The protein quality score of meals will be calculated using the published digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). The proposed study will investigate the link between protein quality, protein source, and the post-meal satiety responses, using a realistic lunch meal approach, in humans. Other than the self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) satiety response, the postprandial glucose dips (i.e. 2-3hours post-meal) will be collected by continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS) as an objective indicator of postprandial self-reported hunger and subsequent energy intake. In addition, the oral processing behaviours of participants will be captured and compared between the test meals.

Detailed Description

Aim: To investigate how differences in protein quality (i.e. high vs low quality) and protein sources (i.e. plant vs animal proteins) influence the satisfaction, satiety responses (fullness over the time) and subsequent food intake.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2024
End Date
December 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
Male

Investigators

Sponsor
Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Teo Pey Sze

Senior Scientist I

Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy male
  • Aged between 21 and 50-year-old
  • Are of normal weight (BMI 18-25kg/m2)
  • Stable weight for the previous 12 months (\<5kg weight fluctuation in the previous year)
  • Healthy dentition and ability to bite, chew and swallow normally
  • No history of pain or discomfort in jaw movements or excessive teeth clenching or grinding
  • No dental carries or periodontal disease
  • Own a mobile device with Apple iOS Operating System version 15.0 -17.3 or Android Operating System version 10-14
  • Have access to a data plan
  • Comfortable with needles and insertion of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System device for 3-7 days

Exclusion Criteria

  • Are a smoker
  • Have any dislikes, intolerances or allergies to foods or common food ingredients e.g. nuts, soya, wheat, gluten, cereal, fruits, biscuits, dairy products, rice, vegetable, meat, seafood, sugar and sweetener, gelatin, natural food colourings or flavourings (e.g. MSG), etc.
  • Have any specific dietary requirements and/ or restrictions (e.g. Vegan/ vegetarian, religious beliefs, lactose intolerance, calorie restricted diet etc.)
  • Known sensitivity to medical-grade adhesives
  • Bleeding disorders (e.g Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease etc.)
  • Have sinus problems that affect your taste and smell
  • Have known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
  • Are taking insulin or medication known to affect your appetite or metabolism
  • Have major chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer or diabetes mellitus etc.
  • Have active Tuberculosis (TB) or currently receiving treatment for TB

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Post-Prandial Sensor Glucose Readings

Time Frame: During the test day 2, 5, 8, up to 48 hours per test day. There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

A continuous monitoring glucose sensor will be used to measure participants sensor glucose readings. The post-prandial sensor glucose readings 2-3h post meal will be used as an objective indicator of postprandial self-reported hunger and subsequent energy intake.

Oral processing behaviour

Time Frame: During test day 2, 5 and 8, up to 20 minutes per test day. There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

Participants will be video recorded during the lunch sessions to measure oral processing behavior (e.g., derived from number of bites, chews, swallows and eating duration) of the fixed portion test meals using an annotation software

Change in Post breakfast satiety responses

Time Frame: During test day 2, 5 and 8, at 15- or 30-minutes intervals, up to 4 hours each test day. There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

Participants will be asked rate their appetite sensations using a visual analogue scale (VAS) pre- and post meals. VAS is anchored at: Not at all (0) to Extremely (100), where a higher score will indicate greater intensity.

Ad-libitum snack intake

Time Frame: During test day 2, 5, and 8, up to 15 minutes per test day. There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

Participants will be asked to eat an ad-libitum amount of snack 2h post lunch. The amount of food consumed will be weighed.

Subsequent food intake post test meal

Time Frame: During test day 2, 5 and 8, up to participant's bedtime per test day (before 12am midnight of the next day). There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

Participants will be asked to bring a food dairy home to record their food and beverage intake for the rest of the test day. This is to assess participants calorie intake for the remaining day on the test session.

Change in Post lunch satiety responses

Time Frame: During test day 2, 5 and 8, at 15- or 30-minutes intervals, up to 2 hours each test day. There is a one-week wash-out period between test days

Participants will be asked rate their appetite sensations using a visual analogue scale (VAS) pre- and post meals. VAS is anchored at: Not at all (0) to Extremely(100), where a higher score will indicate greater intensity.

Similar Trials