A study to compare efficacy of oral terbinafine and I.P.L.(Intense Pulsed Light)v/s oral terbinafine alone in resistant tinea
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: L088- Other specified local infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/01/016867
- Lead Sponsor
- MGM Medical college and Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1)All patients of difficult to treat tinea.
2)Only those patients who have at least 5 patches are selected.
3)Age: have completed 18 years of age
4)Belonging to either sex. males or females
Exclusion Criteria
1)Patient with hypersensitivity to drug or patient intolerant to the study medication.
2)Patients of tinea cruris,onychomycosis
3)Pregnancy
4)Breastfeeding
5)At the site of active skin infection. e.g.impetigo or herpes simplex
6)Previous experience of photosensitivity/sun allergies
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study the efficacy of Oral Terbinafine and I.P.L.(Intense Pulsed Light)v/s Oral Terbinafine alone.Timepoint: Every 2 weeks for 2 months then follow up every 1 month for next 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study adverse effect of Intense Pulsed Light and Oral Terbinafine.Timepoint: Every 2 weeks for 2 months then follow up every 1 month for next 3 months