MedPath

A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Current Non-Biologic DMARD Therapy or the First Anti-TNF Biologic Agent

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02046603
Lead Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Brief Summary

This open-label study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARD therapy or the first anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent. Participants will receive tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously once a week for 52 weeks.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
162
Inclusion Criteria
  • Active RA according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria or EULAR/ACR (2010) criteria
  • Participants who have an inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARD therapy or the first anti-TNF agent (in monotherapy or in combination with MTX or other non-biologic DMARDs). Inadequate response to anti-TNF treatment is defined as DAS28 score improvement of less than 1.2 or participants achieving a DAS28 score improvement of 1.2 but not achieving low disease activity (current DAS28-ESR above 3.2) according to a treat-to-target strategy and have not been previously exposed to treatment with tocilizumab. Inadequate response to non-biologic DMARD therapy will be assessed according to local guidelines and the participants will need to be eligible for biologic therapy according to local guidelines
  • Oral corticosteroids (≤10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; up to recommended dose) are permitted if on stable dose regimen for greater than or equal to [≥] 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Permitted non-biologic DMARDs are allowed if on stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Receiving treatment on an outpatient basis, not including tocilizumab
  • Females of childbearing potential and males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use reliable means of contraception as defined by protocol during the study and for at least 3 months following the last dose of tocilizumab
Exclusion Criteria
  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following baseline
  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
  • Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA before the age of 16
  • Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • Exposure to tocilizumab either intravenous or SC at any time prior to baseline
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening
  • Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
  • Known active current or history of recurrent infections
  • Major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of screening
  • Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years
  • Positive for hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Inadequate hematologic, renal or liver function

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDsDMARDsParticipants will receive a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDsOral CorticosteroidsParticipants will receive a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDsTocilizumabParticipants will receive a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
Tocilizumab MonotherapyTocilizumabParticipants will receive a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDsMethotrexateParticipants will receive a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2

DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR greater than or equal to (≥) 2.6 to less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>) 3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and less than (\<) 2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 4Baseline, Week 4

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 8Baseline, Week 8

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 20Baseline, Week 20

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 24Baseline, Week 24

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 28Baseline, Week 28

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 32Baseline, Week 32

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 36Baseline, Week 36

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 40Baseline, Week 40

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 44Baseline, Week 44

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 12Baseline, Week 12

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 16Baseline, Week 16

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 48Baseline, Week 48

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 52Baseline, Week 52

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Early WithdrawalBaseline, early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) ResponseBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20 percent (%) improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein \[CRP\] or ESR).

Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 ResponseBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

A participant had an ACR50 response if there was at least a 50% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR).

Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESRBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

DAS28-ESR was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity). DAS28-ESR scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. The DAS28-ESR based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders had a change from baseline \>1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate responders had a change from baseline \>1.2 with a DAS28 score \>3.2 or a change from baseline \>0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤5.1. Participants with change from baseline \>0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score \>5.1, or any score with change from baseline ≤0.6, were assessed as non-responders.

Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early WithdrawalBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient and physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS (0 cm= no disease activity and 10 cm= worst disease activity), and CRP in milligrams per liter (mg/L). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI ≤3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.3 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early WithdrawalBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient and physician's global assessment of disease activity assessed on 0-10 cm VAS (0 cm= no disease activity and 10 cm= worst disease activity). CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI ≤2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Percent Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 68 Joints at Week 52Baseline, Week 52

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 68. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. The outcome is reported as the percent change from baseline to end of treatment (52 weeks).

Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early WithdrawalBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.

Percent Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 66 Joints at Week 52Baseline, Week 52

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 66. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. The outcome is reported as the percent change from baseline to end of treatment (52 weeks).

Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 ResponseBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

A participant had an ACR70 response if there was at least a 70% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR).

Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or DiscontinuationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), follow-up Week 4 (up to Week 56), and follow-up Week 8 (up to Week 60)

Results are reported for number of participants who had non-biologic DMARD/corticosteroid dose reductions and/or discontinuation by reasons for dose reductions or discontinuation (safety reasons, discomfort, lack of efficacy, other reasons, and unknown reasons). Participants may be included under more than one reason.

Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence QuestionnaireBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

Methotrexate adherence was determined from responses to the question 'Over the last 3 months you were prescribed 12 doses of methotrexate, how many (approximately) have you taken?' Adherence (%) was calculated as: (Approximate number of doses taken/12)\*100.

Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

Patient global assessment of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=maximum disease activity.

Patient Pain VAS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

This assessment represents the participant's assessment of his/her current level of pain on a 100 mm horizontal VAS where 0 mm= no pain to 100 mm= unbearable pain.

Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early WithdrawalBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.

Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.

Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR \<2.6 implied clinical remission.

Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

The HAQ-DI questionnaire measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities over past week. Each question is evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale. Total score for HAQ-DI was the average of all questions and ranges from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

The FACIT-F score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score).

Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return RecordsBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)

A diary card was provided to participants to record home injections. Participants were asked to return all empty drug supply boxes, unused pre-filled syringe, and diary cards to the clinic at each visit as a measure of drug accountability and participant compliance. A participant was considered compliant if the participant correctly administered all scheduled doses of SC tocilizumab during the assessment period.

Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab AntibodiesBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)
Serum Levels of TocilizumabBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)

Trial Locations

Locations (38)

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

🇬🇧

Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Royal Sussex County Hospital; Clinical Investigation Research Unit

🇬🇧

Brighton, United Kingdom

University Hospital of Wales; Dept of Rhematology

🇬🇧

Cardiff, United Kingdom

Eastbourne District General Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Eastbourne, United Kingdom

Freeman Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

North Tyneside General Hospital

🇬🇧

North Shields, United Kingdom

Dewsbury & District Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Dewsbury, United Kingdom

Russells Hall Hospital; Rheumatology Department

🇬🇧

Dudley, United Kingdom

Ninewells Hospital

🇬🇧

Dundee, United Kingdom

Western General Hospital; Pharmacy Department

🇬🇧

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Gartnavel General Hospital; Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Diana Princess of Wales Hosp.

🇬🇧

Grimsby, United Kingdom

Princess Alexandra Hospital

🇬🇧

Harlow, United Kingdom

Northwick Park Hospital

🇬🇧

Harrow, United Kingdom

Hemel Hempstead General Hospital; Rheumatology Dept

🇬🇧

Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom

Hull Royal Infirmary; Rheumatology Department

🇬🇧

Hull, United Kingdom

Llandudno General Hospital

🇬🇧

Llandudno, United Kingdom

Whipps Cross Hospital; Rheumatology Dept

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Royal Free Hospital; Department of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Haywood Hospital; Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre

🇬🇧

Stoke-on-trent, United Kingdom

Great Western Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Swindon, United Kingdom

Warrington Hospital

🇬🇧

Warrington, United Kingdom

West Suffolk Hospital

🇬🇧

Bury Saint Edmonds, United Kingdom

Cannock Chase Hospital; Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Cannock, United Kingdom

Christchurch Hospital; Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Bournemouth, United Kingdom

Queens Hospital

🇬🇧

Burton on Trent, United Kingdom

Addenbrooke'S Hospital; Rheumatology Research Unit

🇬🇧

Cambridge, United Kingdom

Broomfield Hospital

🇬🇧

Chelmsford, United Kingdom

Countess of Chester Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Chester, United Kingdom

Maidstone Hospital; Dept of Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Maidstone, United Kingdom

Royal Cornwall Hospital; Rhuematololgy Dept

🇬🇧

Truro, United Kingdom

Wrightington Hospital; Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Wigan, United Kingdom

Wishaw General Hospital

🇬🇧

Wishaw, United Kingdom

Wythenshawe Hospital

🇬🇧

Manchester, United Kingdom

Norfolk & Norwich Hospital; Rheumatology

🇬🇧

Norwich, United Kingdom

Integrated Care Centre

🇬🇧

Oldham, United Kingdom

Solihull Hospital

🇬🇧

Solihull, United Kingdom

Torbay Hospital; Dept of Rhematology

🇬🇧

Torquay, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath