MedPath

Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Dentinal Hypersensitivity
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01831817
Lead Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Brief Summary

The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the treatment effect on dentinal hypersensitivity of a tubule occluding dentifrice as measured by Schiff and Tactile sensitivity. This proof of concept study will compare the test dentifrice with three other treatment groups.

Detailed Description

This will be a single center, eight week, randomized, controlled, examiner blind, four treatment arms, parallel design study in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the Screening and Baseline visit. Participants will be assessed at baseline, four and eight weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
140
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participants between 18 and 55 years of age, in good general health, with pre-existing self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity are required for entry into the study.
  • Participants will be required to have at least four teeth with facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession which respond to qualifying evaporative (air) assessment at the Screening visit and have at least two teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) demonstrating signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile threshold (Yeaple ≤ 20 gram (g)) and evaporative (air) (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2) assessments at the Baseline visit.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Specific Dentition Exclusions for Test teeth

    1. Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of Screening.
    2. Tooth with exposed dentin but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing etiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentin.
    3. Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator
  • Use of a sensitivity dentifrice within 8 weeks of screening

  • Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifriceDentifrice containing 5.0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate
0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifriceDentifrice containing 0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate
Sodium monofluorophosphateSodium monofluorophosphate dentifriceDentifrice containing 1000 ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate
Sodium fluorideSodium Fluoride dentifriceDentifrice containing 1100 ppmF as sodium fluoride
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes "No Pain" and 10 denotes "Intense Pain".

Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes "No Pain" and 10 denotes "Intense Pain".

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.

Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Salus Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath