跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05787158
NCT05787158已完成不适用

Effects of Muscle Energy Techniques Versus Core Stability Exercises in Pelvic Girdle Pain

Riphah International University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 57 人开始时间: 2022年2月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
57
试验地点
2
主要终点
OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX

研究概览

简要总结

PGP is referred to as a specific form of LBP which occurs isolatedly as well as in combination with lumbar back pain. PGP localized to the anterior or posterior pelvis, most commonly located between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal folds especially around the SI joint. Pelvic girdle pain radiated to the posterior thigh

详细描述

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is known to be a musculoskeletal disorders which affects the pelvic bone. PGP is referred to as a specific form of LBP which occurs isolatedly as well as in combination with lumbar back pain. PGP localized to the anterior or posterior pelvis, most commonly located between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal folds especially around the SI joint. Pelvic girdle pain radiated to the posterior thigh. Moreover, it can also cause pain in the symphysis (1). Compared to lower back pain, PGP is substantially more painful and linked with functional limitations as standing, walking, sitting and changing positions are less tolerable in such patients (2). PGP is musculoskeletal in nature and is not caused by gynecological or urological conditions (3). Despite the fact that the cause of PGP is unknown, it is considered that it occurs due to many reasons such as trauma, arthritis, anatomical fault or it can be associated with pregnancy (4

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Females of 25 to 40 years were included in this study.(20)
  • Female patients who gave birth at least 6 months before.(20)
  • Females who gave birth through vaginal delivery.(20)
  • Females with at least three positive pain provocative tests such as posterior pelvic pain provocation test (P4), active straight leg raise test (ASLR), thigh thrust, Patrick's Faber test, Gaenslen's test and distraction test.(20)
  • History of pain around the pelvic girdle, lower back or between the posterior iliac crest and the gluteal fold, difficulty in walking and/or pain when putting weight on one leg

排除标准

  • Females who suffered from grade 3 or 4 vaginal tears during their pregnancy (20)
  • Females who underwent episiotomy during delivery (20)
  • Females who delivered through caesarean section (20)
  • Postpartum females with a history of trauma to the pelvic region (20)
  • Postpartum females with a history of pelvic surgery
  • Postpartum females with a history of other orthopedic disorders

结局指标

主要结局

OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX

时间窗: 12 weeks

Oswestry Disability Index was calculated in order to find out the disability among patients. ODI evaluates disability related to Activities of Daily Living. This is considered to be the best tool for evaluating low back issues. It encompasses 10 questions with each question scoring five. Questions related to pain, personal care, walking, standing, lifting, sitting, sex life, sleeping, social life and travelling are included. The interpretation shows minimal disability if the patient score is 0-20%, moderate disability if the score is 20-40%, 40 - 60% severe disability, 60 - 80% crippled and 80 - 100 % depicting that the patient is either bed bound or overly expressing the symptoms

SF - 36

时间窗: 12 weeks

This questionnaire is used to assess the functional performance in different domains of life like physical, body pain, mental, social and psychological. The questionnaire encompasses questions based on 7 domains of life. The minimum score of SF-36 is 0 which means that the functional performance is worst whereas the highest score is 100 which means that functional performance is best

VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE

时间窗: 12 weeks

Visual Analogue scale is a numeric scale ranging from 1 to 10. These ranges show the intensity of pain where 1 shows no pain and 10 shows worst pain imaginations. It is a very reliable and valid tool with test-retest reliability of r = 0.96 and validity correlations of 0.86 to 0.95.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验