Randomized Clinical Trial of Inhaled Sedation with Sevoflurane in Critically Ill Patients at Risk of Developing the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- CHU Gabriel-Montpied
- Enrollment
- 80
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- longitudinal evolution in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy of inhaled sevoflurane, compared to current intravenous sedation practice, for improving PaO2/FiO2 in ICU patients at high risk for ARDS.
Detailed Description
MAIN OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of inhaled sevoflurane, compared to current intravenous sedation practice, for improving PaO2/FiO2 in ICU patients at high risk for ARDS. HYPOTHESIS The investigators hypothesized that a strategy of inhaled sedation with sevoflurane could be more effective than current intravenous sedation practice at improving pulmonary function during the early days of ICU admission, in patients at risk of ARDS.
Investigators
Lise Laclautre
Scientific
CHU Gabriel-Montpied
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age ≥ 18 years
- •Admitted to participating ICUs with at least one known risk factor for ARDS and a LIPS equals to, or greater than 4
- •Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
- •With expected duration of sedation superior or equal to 4 hours
- •Affiliation to the French Sécurité Sociale
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient under a tutelage measure
- •Presence of ARDS prior to randomization
- •Endotracheal ventilation for greater than 24 hours prior to randomization
- •Home mechanical ventilation (non-invasive ventilation or via tracheotomy) except for CPAP/BIPAP used solely for sleep-disordered breathing
- •Tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) below 200 mL (i.e. height inferior to 134cm for a man and 139cm for a woman)
- •Moribund patient, i.e. not expected to survive 24 hours despite intensive care
- •Previous hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to sevoflurane or to the intravenous sedation agent routinely used in the participating ICU (such as midazolam, propofol, or dexmedetomidine)
- •Contra-indications to the intravenous sedative agent routinely used in the participating ICU (such as midazolam, propofol, or dexmedetomidine
- •Medical history of malignant hyperthermia
- •Long QT syndrome at risk of arrhythmic events
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
longitudinal evolution in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio
longitudinal evolution in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio
Secondary Outcomes
- Progression to ARDS will be assessed according to the Berlin criteria, including chest radiographs
- Rate of pneumonia
- Ventilator-free days
- Organ failure-free days
- Mortality
- Length of ICU-stay
- Physiological measures
- ICU-acquired delirium
- Biomarker measurements