ACTRN12607000338460RecruitingPhase 4
A study to compare the effectiveness and safety of an oral low dose and a megadose vitamin D treatment regimens - a real-life comparison pilot study.
Prof. Peter Ebeling0 sites60 target enrollmentStarted: June 26, 2007Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 60
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomised controlled trial
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Open (masking not used)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 90 Years (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Serum 25(0H) concentration < 50 nmol/L and ability to consent to trial participation.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Inability to either give informed consent or complete the three month study, primary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism or other causes of hypercalcaemia.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
Is spinal anaesthesia more safe and effective than general anaesthesia for open surgery of gall bladder?CTRI/2015/04/005715Dr Ram Bhakta Koju120
Completed
Phase 1
The effect of ajicoat and cadaver on burn treatmentIRCT20190807044468N1Esfahan University of Medical Sciences50
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
To assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of olopatadine 0.7 percent and alcatadine 0.25 percent in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.CTRI/2024/05/067217Pt B.D. Sharma UHS Rohtak
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison between 3 surgical treatments in stable vitiligo patientsCTRI/2019/11/021900GCS Medical college Hospital and Research center6
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
To find out effect and safety of luliconazole and ketoconazole in patient with tinea versicolor diseaseCTRI/2023/07/055746Pt BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak