Video laryngoscope verses direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation among elective surgeries in Orotta and Halibet National Referral Hospitals Asmara, Eritrea.
Phase 1
Completed
- Conditions
- Ear, Nose and ThroatAnaesthesia
- Registration Number
- PACTR202309750598928
- Lead Sponsor
- Orotta College of Medicne and Health Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 96
Inclusion Criteria
Patients from the age group >18
Elective patients under general anesthesia ,
patients ASA classification of I and II
patients who have agreed to participate on the study
Exclusion Criteria
patients who were intubated before arrival to operation theatre,
those who were hemodynamic instability,
upper respiratory tract infection and known history of difficult intubation.
patients who declined to participate in the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms of video laryngoscopes in improving glottic visualization during endotracheal intubation?
How does video laryngoscope compare to direct laryngoscope in terms of intubation success rates in elective surgeries?
Are there specific anatomical biomarkers that predict better outcomes with video laryngoscope use in Eritrean populations?
What are the potential adverse events associated with video laryngoscope use in anaesthesia and their management strategies?
What are the current trends in video laryngoscope technology compared to traditional direct laryngoscopes in ENT and anaesthesia fields?