Impact of a Prehospital Discrimination Between Trauma Patients With or Without Early Acute Coagulopathy of Trauma and the Need for Damage Control Resuscitation : a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 400
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Seven days mortality
研究概览
简要总结
Early identification of trauma patients in need for Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) has potential to be beneficial for general emergency units that are not expected to be ready for this rare situation 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. It could also be useful for high performing trauma centers to identify such patients earlier and be able to provide earlier adequate treatment.
By contrast, initiation of DCR in patients who do not require this aggressive therapy may negatively affect their survival. An early identification of patients who do not require DCR would probably be beneficial (impact on cost-effectiveness and on patients' survival).
The evidence of the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) accuracy has been evaluated in several studies but the potential effect of its use on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated. There has never been any evaluation of the impact of a prehospital discrimination of trauma patients with or without the need for DCR.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on mortality of a prehospital discrimination between trauma patients with or without a potential need for DCR. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the feasibility of such discrimination and its impact on cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that the information will lead to improved quality of care with reduced mortality and morbidity.
详细描述
The trial will be designed as randomized phase II clinical trial with comparison of the experimental protocol (prehospital discrimination using the TICCS) against the standard of care. Patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio in two groups: the intervention group will benefit from a prehospital evaluation using the TICCS and from a specific treatment protocol regarding the TICCS value. The control group will benefit from the standard local care.
The trial will involve several participating prehospital and hospital teams across Belgium.
Control and intervention group will only differ in the management of potential bleeding and coagulopathy. All patients will benefit from the recommended level of care regarding their situation, including airway management, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) management, control of external bleeding, cervical spine and extremities immobilization if needed ...
Control group The patients allocated in the control group will be managed as recommended in the local guidelines and protocols. As the trial involves participating centers with different prehospital and hospital realities and local practices, the control group will reflect a wide panel of levels of care and will not be limited to a unique approach.
Intervention group The TICCS will be calculated on the site of injury for the patients taken in charge in the intervention group. Those patients will be classified in two categories regarding their TICCS value. Patients with TICCS ≥ 10 will be classified as in need for DCR; while patients with TICCS < 10 will be classified as not in need for DCR.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Prehospital intervention of paramedical or medical team involved in the present trial
- •Admission in a hospital involved in this trial
排除标准
- •Spontaneous admission without prehospital intervention
- •Penetrating trauma
研究组 & 干预措施
Control group
The patients allocated in the control group will be managed as recommended in the local guidelines and protocols. As the trial involves participating centers with different prehospital and hospital realities and local practices, the control group will reflect a wide panel of levels of care and will not be limited to a unique approach.
干预措施: Regular care (Diagnostic Test)
Control group
The patients allocated in the control group will be managed as recommended in the local guidelines and protocols. As the trial involves participating centers with different prehospital and hospital realities and local practices, the control group will reflect a wide panel of levels of care and will not be limited to a unique approach.
干预措施: Regular Care (Other)
Intervention group
Patients will be classified in two categories regarding their TICCS value. Patients with TICCS ≥ 10 will be classified as in need for DCR; while patients with TICCS < 10 will be classified as not in need for DCR.
TICCS < 10 This subgroup will be considered without a need for DCR and without coagulopathy. There will not be any activation of the DCR components (no phone contact to the blood bank, to the surgical team, no prehospital transfusion). There will be any prehospital treatment/prevention of the hyperfibrinolysis using Tranexamic acid (TXA). Crystalloids infusion will be allowed.
TICCS ≥ 10 This subgroup will be considered with a need for DCR and with coagulopathy. They will be treated using the STTTOPPP the bleeding protocol.
干预措施: Use of the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) as a diagnostic tool. (Diagnostic Test)
Intervention group
Patients will be classified in two categories regarding their TICCS value. Patients with TICCS ≥ 10 will be classified as in need for DCR; while patients with TICCS < 10 will be classified as not in need for DCR.
TICCS < 10 This subgroup will be considered without a need for DCR and without coagulopathy. There will not be any activation of the DCR components (no phone contact to the blood bank, to the surgical team, no prehospital transfusion). There will be any prehospital treatment/prevention of the hyperfibrinolysis using Tranexamic acid (TXA). Crystalloids infusion will be allowed.
TICCS ≥ 10 This subgroup will be considered with a need for DCR and with coagulopathy. They will be treated using the STTTOPPP the bleeding protocol.
干预措施: STTTOPPP the bleeding (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Seven days mortality
时间窗: seven days
Overall mortality
次要结局
- Thirty days mortality(Thirty days)
- Hospital length-of-stay(Thirty days)
- Blood products transfusion(Thirty days)
研究者
Martin L Tonglet
MD, PhD
University of Liege