跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/088793
CTRI/2025/06/088793招募中不适用

Impact of Regional and General Anaesthesia for Below knee amputations on duration of post operative hospital stay and associated 30 day post-operative outcomes – A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital in India

Department of Anaesthesia1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 199 人开始时间: 2025年6月23日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
199
试验地点
1
主要终点
Impact of Anaesthetic technique (GA versus Regional) on post operative length of Hospital admission including ICU stay and other postoperative complications for patients undergoing lower limb below knee amputations

研究概览

简要总结

Lower limb amputationsare regularly performed as a life saving surgeries in the underlyingcircumstances of sepsis, peripheral arterial disease or trauma. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) anddiabetes mellitus (DM) have been identified as primary risk factors for lowerlimb amputations. The reasons for limb loss can be classified into the followingcategories: patient-specific issues such as comorbidities, presence of footlesions, anatomical factors, and healthcare-related factors like access tohealthcare and medical insurance. Indications for amputation are related to the degree of tissue necrosisor viability, and it is performable in either a single operation or a stagedmanner. In general, soft tissue quality and the ability to obtain bone coveragewill guide the adequacy of the level of amputation. Patients who undergo LEA usually havecomorbidities, including hypertension, heart failure, and end-stage renaldisease and are likely to be in an older age group. Furthermore, these patientshave advanced systemic atherosclerotic disease involving not only theperipheral limbs but also the coronary, cerebral, and renal circulations. HenceAnaesthetic management for such patients is chosen carefully. Because of ultrasoundguidance, the usage of regional anaesthesia (RA) has increased since 2005.Additionally, compared to general anaesthesia (GA), RA has a number ofphysiological advantages, including as better stump flow, preservation of thebody’s physiological reaction to stress, and comparable or greater analgesiafollowing surgery.  Compared with GA,neuraxial anaesthesia, in particular, has been associated with lower 30-daymortality and decreased morbidity, less blood loss, fewer surgical site infections,and a decreased rate of admission to critical care services after electivetotal hip or knee arthroplasty. The aim of the study isto compare the impact of Regional Anaesthesia and General Anaesthesia on theLength of Hospital stay and mortality and morbidity of patients in the 30 daypost-op period in Indian Setting

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • All patients undergoing elective and emergency Lower limb amputations pertaining to Below knee amputations.

排除标准

  • 1.Patients already intubated prior to presenting to Operating Theatre 2.Patients undergoing other forms of amputations like Ray amputations.
  • 3.Patients undergoing other surgical interventions along with the above mentioned amputations requiring General anaesthesia 4.Patients undergoing General anaesthesia combined with regional analgesia techniques (Epidural / Peripheral nerve blocks).

结局指标

主要结局

Impact of Anaesthetic technique (GA versus Regional) on post operative length of Hospital admission including ICU stay and other postoperative complications for patients undergoing lower limb below knee amputations

时间窗: 30 days post operative follow up of patients

次要结局

  • Comparing Regional and General anaesthesia, Impact of sociodemographic and comorbidity variables on 30 day postoperative complications (mortality and morbidity).(30 days follow up of patients undergoing the procedure)

研究者

申办方类型
Private medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验