Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (NIS) To Investigate The Safety And Effectiveness Of MACUGEN In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice
- Conditions
- Age-related Macular Degeneration
- Interventions
- Other: no intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT00787319
- Lead Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Brief Summary
To define what procedures were used for the diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment age-related macular degeneration (AMD). What is the effect of the Macugen, compliance with Macugen treatment, safety profile of Macugen, final physician assessment of treatment with Macugen.
- Detailed Description
no sampling
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 108
- age over 18 years old
- patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
- enrollment to study is fully on physician decision in compliance with current SPC
- Patient who did not meet indication according to SPC Macugen.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AMD no intervention -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET]) Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Physician's Assessment of Efficacy Week 104 or End of study (EOS) Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102 VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported.
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102 VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pfizer Investigational Site
🇨🇿Usti nad Labem, Czechia