MedPath

Observational Study Of The Long-Term Effect Of Macugen In Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Completed
Conditions
Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Macular Degeneration
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01245387
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

Long-term observational study to assess the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) under Macugen treatment.

Detailed Description

Ophthalmologists who are experienced in doing intravitreal injections in Germany

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1001
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Exclusion Criteria
  • none

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MacugenPegaptanib-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Acuity (VA)Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination

VA measured at each follow-up visit as the number of lines read on a standard eye chart (Snellen or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study \[EDTRS\]) using a 5 meter distance, 1 meter distance, or verifying if participant was able to count fingers, perceive hand motion, or light. Follow-up visits occurred only if considered part of standard medical treatment. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 2: first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).

Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25): Overall Composite ScoreBaseline, every 6 months up to Month 24 or early termination

Participant-reported vision-related functioning and quality of life measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ-25. Converted scale 0-100 where higher score represented better functioning: General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain: 4,19; Near Vision: 5,6,7; Distance Vision: 8,9,14; Social Functioning: 11,13; Mental Health Activities: 3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties: 17,18; Dependency: 20,23,24; Driving: 15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.

Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of EfficacyMonth 24 or early termination

Investigator's categorical assessment of the efficacy of Macugen (pegaptanib) treatment at the final visit or termination of therapy; Categories included Very Good, Good, Moderate, and Poor.

Lesion Size (Number of Optic Disc Areas)Baseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination

Lesion size measured by Investigator after each injection as part of standard of care (SOC), using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Reported as the number of optic-disk areas, each of which were 2.54 millimeters squared (mm\^2). Lesion size included choroidal neovascularization, exudation area, and hemorrhage, if present. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 6Week 6

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 12Week 12

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 18Week 18

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 24Week 24

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 30Week 30

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 36Week 36

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 42Week 42

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 48Week 48

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 54Week 54

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 60Week 60

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 12, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 66Week 66

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 13, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Week 72Week 72

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at Visit 14, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity.

Number of Participants With a Change in Activity of Neovascular Membrane at Last VisitMonth 24 or early termination

Neovascular membrane activity (measured by leakage) assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included increased, unchanged or decreased neovascular membrane activity. Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.

Number of Participants With Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) at BaselineBaseline

PED assessed by Investigator at baseline as part of SOC for participants with age-related macular degeneration; Standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 6Week 6

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 12Week 12

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 18Week 18

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 24Week 24

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 30Week 30

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 36Week 36

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 42Week 42

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 48Week 48

PED assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Week 54Week 54

PED assessed by Investigator Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent.

Number of Participants With PED at Last VisitMonth 24 or early termination

PED assessed by Investigator at Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein or indocyanine green angiography); Categories included present or absent. Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.

Central Retinal ThicknessBaseline, every 6 weeks up to Month 24 or early termination

Central retinal thickness assessed by Investigator every 6 weeks, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (optical coherence tomography) and reported as mean central retinal thickness. The timeframe was as follows: Visit 1: before first injection; Visit 3: 6 weeks after first injection (second injection).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at BaselineBaseline

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Baseline, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent \[%\] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 6Week 6

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 3, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent \[%\] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 12Week 12

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 4, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent \[%\] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 18Week 18

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 5, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent \[%\] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 24Week 24

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 6, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent \[%\] classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 30Week 30

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 7, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the percent (%) classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 36Week 36

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 8, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 42Week 42

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 9, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 48Week 48

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 10, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Week 54Week 54

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at Visit 11, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic).

Number of Participants With Angiographic Subtype Reported at Last VisitMonth 24 or early termination

Angiographic subtype assessed by Investigator at the Last Visit, as part of SOC, using standard clinical methods practiced (fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography) and the % classic fraction categories included unclear, occult (0% classic), minimally classic (1-49% classic), predominantly classic (50-99% classic), and pure classic (100% classic). Last Visit: last available postbaseline value.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath