跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/02/062888
CTRI/2024/02/062888已完成不适用

A randomised controlled trial comparing the incidence of malposition in videolaryngoscope-guided versus conventional blind insertion of I-gel supraglottic airway in elderly patients under general anaesthesia.

AIIMS Patna1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2024年2月29日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
102
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the incidence of malposition of Igel using video laryngoscopy guided versus conventional blind insertion technique

研究概览

简要总结

Due to anatomic and physiological changes associated with aging, geriatric patients are more vulnerable to respiratory and hemodynamic complications during endotracheal intubation and extubation. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) example I gel minimize airway morbidity while increasing hemodynamic stability in adults.As a person matures, there is an increase in parapharyngeal fat, which increases the risk of airway collapse and apnea.There is increased incidence of malposition of supraglottic device in elderly.There is only limited literature comparing the clinical performance of I gel in geriatric patients.Thus the aim of the study is to compare the incidence of malposition of igel between Videolaryngoscopy guided technique of I-gel insertion and conventional blind insertion technique in elderly undergoing surgical procedures under general anaesthesia

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
65.00 Year(s) 至 85.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients planned for elective surgery of duration less than three hours under general anesthesia will be included in the study ASAPS Grade one two three BMI less than thirty five.

排除标准

  • High risk of aspiration Unstable vital signs Cervical spine problems BMI more than thirty five Abnormality of the oral cavity or pharynx High possibility of respiratory complications Patient refusal for participation in the study.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the incidence of malposition of Igel using video laryngoscopy guided versus conventional blind insertion technique

时间窗: 2 minutes after induction

次要结局

  • To evaluate and compare(-the oropharyngeal leak pressure)

研究者

发起方
AIIMS Patna
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Haritha D

AIIMS patna

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验