Pilot study evaluating the feasibility of endoscopy guided fiducial marker placement for rectal cancer.
- Conditions
- rectal cancerrectal carcinoma1001799010017991
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON41313
- Lead Sponsor
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
• Histologically proven diagnosis of primary rectal adenocarcinoma
• Treatment plan:
o 5x5 Gray (Gy) neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by TME
* cT1-3N1 / cT3N0 with extramural invasion >5 mm
* Distance to mesorectal fascia >1 mm
OR
o Chemoradiation consisting of 25 x 1,8 Gy combined with Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily followed by TME
* cT4 / cT2-3 with distance to mesorectal fascia <=1 mm
and/or
* cN2 / extramesorectal pathological lymph nodes
OR
o 5x5 Gy RT followed by chemotherapy (with or without a subsequent TME)
* rectal cancer with resectable liver metastases
• Written informed consent
• Coagulopathy (prothrombin time < 50% of control; partial thromboplastin time > 50 seconds) or anticoagulantia (marcoumar, sintrom or new oral anticoagulants) that cannot be stopped
• Prior pelvic irradiation or surgery that may affect the placement of the markers
• World health organization performance status 3-4
• Pregnant women
• Patients who underwent a hip replacement
• Patients with a contraindication for MRI (e.g. pacemaker, metallic foreign body in the eye, cerebral aneurysm clips, claustrophobia)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The feasibility of fiducial marker placement, defined as the technical success<br /><br>(the ability to successfully place the fiducials at the desired locations in<br /><br>the tumour area, without grade 3-4 complications or symptoms lasting more than<br /><br>two days), the visibility of fiducial markers on MRI and CT, the migration of<br /><br>fiducial markers and the patient safety of marker placement. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>A secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the intrafraction movement of the<br /><br>rectum as visualized on cone beam CT scan. </p><br>