跳至主要内容
临床试验/ACTRN12605000621617
ACTRN12605000621617已完成不适用

A comparison of the effectiveness of traditional vaginal colporraphy with colporraphay using mesh augmentation in women with vaginal prolapse as assessed using the pelvic organ prolpse quantification examination.

Johnson and Johnson0 个研究点目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2005年10月10日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
128

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomised controlled trial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Open (masking not used)

入排标准

年龄范围
ot stated 至 ot stated(—)
性别
Female

入选标准

  • Women with posterior and anterior vaginal wall prolapse with at least one site being of stage 2 or more.(ICS quantitative pelvic organ prolapse examination system).Women with cocomitant urinary symptoms and /or anorectal symptoms maybe included.Women requiring anterior and posterior repair.Women with urodynamic stress incontinence will be offered a mid urethral sling procedure.Willingness to participate.

排除标准

  • Women with apical or vault prolapse of stage 2 or more(ICS quantitative pelvic organ porlapse examination system).Medically unfit for surgery.Women undergoing concomittant abdominal surgery for prolapse eg abdominal sacral colpopexy, Paravaginal repair.Refusal to participate.

研究者

发起方
Johnson and Johnson

相似试验