MedPath

Effect of Honey for CIN II

Phase 1
Recruiting
Conditions
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia-II
High Risk Human Papillomavirus
Interventions
Other: Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®)
Registration Number
NCT06219018
Lead Sponsor
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Brief Summary

The following hypothesis is tested: Medical grade honey in CIN II causes a higher clearance of the hr-HPV virus and an increase in the normalization of CIN II lesions compared to expectant management.

Detailed Description

In this pilot study, we will include 60 patients with newly diagnosed CIN II. Patients will be counseled according to standard guidelines between a LLETZ, imiquimod or expectant management. Patients choosing for expectant management will be asked to participate in the study and will be treated with medical grade honey. Patients choosing for expectant management but not participating in the study and thus not using medicinal honey will be asked for the control arm. Follow-up assessment takes place in accordance with the national guideline (first check-up is after 6 months). In addition, swabs for vaginal microbiota analysis will be taken at 0 and 6 months. Immunohistochemical stainings for the local immune infiltrate will be performed on biopsies taken during regular colposcopy at t=0. This exploratory study assesses the potential effect of honey and provides insight into its mechanisms of action.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Women 18-40 years
  • Primary CIN II confirmed histologically in the biopsy on colposcopic examination
  • Sufficient mastery of the Dutch language
Exclusion Criteria
  • Simultaneous abnormality in columnar epithelial cells (AIS).
  • Hr-HPV negative cytology
  • Immunosuppressant use/Autoimmune disease (HIV, CVID)
  • History of cervical carcinoma or previous treatment for CIN (LLETZ or imiquimod)
  • Pregnancy or the intention to become pregnant during the study period
  • Legal incompetence
  • Known allergies to honey

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®) for CIN II group 2Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®)Group 2, pt 20-40: daily application of 5 grams (with applicator) for 3 months. Then weekly applications (5 grams with applicator) for3 months.
Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®) for CIN II group 1Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®)Group 1, pt 0-20: daily application of 5 grams (with applicator) for 1 month. Followed by weekly applications (5 grams withapplicator) for 5 months.
Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®) for CIN II group 3Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®)Group 3, pt 40-60: daily application of 5 grams (with applicator) for 6 months
Medical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®) for CIN IIMedical grade honey formulation (MGH) (L-Mesitran®)Daily application of 5 grams (with applicator) for 3 months. Then weekly application (5 grams with applicator) for 3 months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clearance of hr-HPV6 months

The following hypothesis is tested: Medical grade honey in CIN II causes a higher clearance of the hr-HPV virus

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Regression of CIN II12-24 months

Defined as a regression to Pap1

Clearance of hr-HPV and normalization of cytology (KOPAC)12-24 mnths

Normalization of cytology (KOPAC) (depending on NVOG/RIVM flowchart).

Characteristics of the vaginal microbiome0-6 months

Species specific and diversity analysis, changes due to honey and relationship with the other outcomes measures

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Zuyderland MC

🇳🇱

Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands

Maastricht University Medical Centre+

🇳🇱

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath