VIVO™ Accuracy Study
- Conditions
- Ventricular TachycardiaPremature Ventricular Contraction
- Interventions
- Device: VIVO™
- Registration Number
- NCT03340142
- Lead Sponsor
- Catheter Precision. Inc.
- Brief Summary
A multi-center study designed to assess the accuracy of VIVO™ in determining the location of a PVC/VT foci in comparison to an electroanatomical mapping system.
- Detailed Description
The VIVO accuracy study will assess the accuracy of locating a PVC/VT foci by pacing known anatomical locations and comparing the VIVO outcome to that of the Carto system (Biosense-Webster).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 45
- Subjects who are at least 18 years or older
- Subjects who are scheduled for PVC/VT ablation procedure with structurally normal hearts and less than 10% scar.
- Subjects who have signed an IRB/EC approved Informed Consent Form and applicable subject privacy protection authorization per local law
- Subjects will be selected without regard to gender or age (unless precluded by local regulatory requirements)
- Subjects who are contraindicated for CT or MRI (must be able to get one)
- Subject whose MRI or CT scan does not comply with the requirements of this protocol
- Subjects who are contraindicated for an electrophysiology procedure and/or fluoroscopy:
- INR > 3
- Active infection
- Pregnancy: Females of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test.
- Existing mechanical heart valve
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Single Arm VIVO™ All patients will undergo standard of care ablation procedures. VIVO™ results will be compared to that of standard of care results, but will not be used in diagnosis or treatment.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy of correctly identifying PVC or VT origin 1 Day Determine the accuracy of VIVO in identifying a PVC/VT to the left or right ventricle or the septum. The origin, identified by VIVO, will be compared to the Carto system and the successful ablation location.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy of correctly identifying known pacing sites 1 Day Determine the accuracy of VIVO in identifying the location of known pacing sites as compared to the Carto system. The origin, identified by VIVO, will be compared to the location identified by Carto as well as the successful ablation location.
Number of adverse events 1 Day Monitor adverse events that occur during the procedure followed by a review from the CEC for correlation to VIVO and adjudication if appropriate.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Medical Unversity of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States
University of Iowa
🇺🇸Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Johns Hopkins Unveristy
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States