Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06227039
NCT06227039
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Using Augmented Reality With Vibroacoustic Stimulation to Improve the Patient Experience During In-Office Otorhinolaryngology Procedures

University of Virginia1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentOctober 1, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain, Acute
Sponsor
University of Virginia
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Average pain experienced
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In-office procedures (IOPs) are a cost-effective, and safe alternative to many operating room procedure, with benefits such as reduced anesthesia risk. One of the major causes of failed in-office procedures or requirement of conversion to the operating room is poor patient tolerance. Vibration and augmented reality (AR) can be used as non-pharmacologic treatment options to treat patient anxiety and pain by using the physiology proposed by the gate-way theory of pain as well as distraction. This study seeks to compare anxiety and pain perception with patient reported survey data, as well as physiologic indicators of stress such as heart rate variability (HRV) within patients undergoing IOPs in a laryngology office with and without vibration and AR treatment.

Detailed Description

In-office procedures (IOPs) represent a cost-effective and safe alternative to operating room procedures for a myriad of disease processes across medical and surgical specialties. IOPs are performed under local anesthetic without general anesthesia or sedation, resulting in faster and often safer procedures by eliminating risks associated with general anesthesia. IOPs are primarily limited by patient tolerance, as there is a lack of currently available non-pharmacologic treatment options for patient anxiety, stress, discomfort, and pain during these procedures. The Gate Control Theory of Pain postulates that only a limited amount of simultaneous sensory stimuli can be processed by the central nervous system and therefore non-painful stimuli, such as vibration or virtual distraction (i.e. virtual or augmented reality), can eliminate or lessen the perception of concurrent painful stimuli. The use of these non-painful stimuli has been shown to have clinical utility in the setting of procedures such as percutaneous injections and wound dressing changes. However, the coupling of multiple sensory distraction techniques has not been described for IOPs. Furthermore, no investigation of sensory distraction techniques to reduce patient discomfort within the field of otolaryngology has been conducted. The focus of the proposed project is to improve patient experience during IOPs by coupling a novel vibroacoustic stimulation device with original AR software applications. In-office otolaryngology procedures specifically involve using a rigid endoscope or a flexible nasolarynogoscopy to visualize the inside of a patient nose, sinus, posterior oropharynx, and vocal cords. Using these imaging modalities, awake, in-office procedures can be performed. However, these procedures are often very uncomfortable and anxiety producing. The goal of the study is to determine whether or not wearing an augmented reality headset with a novel game and vibroacoustic simulation device can help reduce anxiety and improve the patient experience of in-office otolaryngology procedures. The device consists of an augmented reality headset worn by the patient, a vibration device that is applied to the patient's neck to help reduce the sensation of the procedure, and a clicker that allows the patient to interact with the augmented reality game environment. Patients who are undergoing in-office laryngology procedures (procedures on their vocal cords) will be randomized into a control group augmented reality (AR) group, vibration group, and combined AR and vibration group. The control group will wear a sham augmented reality head set during the procedure. The AR group will have a game played on the head set to distract them during the procedure. The patient will interact with the game use a hand held clicker. Each participant will answer a survey before and after the procedure assessing their anxiety. Each participant will also wear a one-lead EKG to measure their heart rate through the procedure. The subjective and physiological level will be compared between the two groups

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 1, 2022
End Date
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

James Daniero, MD

Associate Professor, Division Director, Laryngology and Voice Care

University of Virginia

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing office-based laryngology procedure performed at home institution.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Average pain experienced

Time Frame: measured post-treatment (1 hr).

Visual analog scale rating of average perceived pain during procedure

Pain nervousness experienced

Time Frame: measured post-treatment (1 hr).

Visual analog scale rating of how nervous about pain patient was during procedure

Max pain experienced

Time Frame: measured post-treatment (1 hr).

Visual analog scale rating of max perceived pain during procedure

Change in heart rate variability during procedure

Time Frame: calculated post-treatment (1 hr).

Difference between heart rate variability during procedure compared with pre-procedure

Change in average heart rate

Time Frame: calculated post-treatment (1 hr).

Difference between average heart rate during procedure compared with pre-procedure

Time spent thinking about pain

Time Frame: measured post-treatment (1 hr).

Visual analog scale rating of percent of time spent thinking about pain during procedure

Change in maximum heart rate

Time Frame: calculated post-treatment (1 hr).

Difference between maximum heart rate during procedure compared with pre-procedure

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain catastrophizing score(calculated pre-procedure (1 hr).)
  • Change is STAI score(calculated post-procedure (1 hr).)
  • Patient satisfaction(measured post-treatment (1 hr).)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials