Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04483882
NCT04483882CompletedNot Applicable

Utility and Efficacy of Tactile Labeling of Ophthalmic Drops for Identity and Frequency of Administration in Low Vision

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston1 site in 1 country46 target enrollmentStarted: July 24, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
46
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Correct Drug Identity by Shape

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is an evaluation of a tactile labeling strategy developed in the Ophthalmology Clinical Research Center at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in collaboration with the UTMB Maker Space to improve low vision patients capability to identify their topical ophthalmic drop treatments and the frequency with which they should be administered. The labeling strategy includes protrusions as frequency markers and shapes to differentiate between treatments of similar frequency prescription.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is an evaluation of a tactile labeling strategy developed in the Ophthalmology Clinical Research Center at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in collaboration with the UTMB Maker Space to improve low vision patients capability to identify their topical ophthalmic drop treatments and the frequency with which they should be administered. The labeling strategy includes protrusions as frequency markers and shapes to differentiate between treatments of similar frequency prescription.

The first aim is to evaluate the patient capability to identify the number of protrusions and therefore the frequency of administration prescribed. This should be completed in a timeframe that is not frustrating or problematic to the patient in practice.

The second aim is to evaluate the patient ability to differentiate between drugs with similar frequencies based on a shape on the frequency protrusions in a tactile manner. This also should be completed in a timeframe that is not over burdensome or frustrating to the patient. The protocol is designed to evaluate this tactile labeling design in the population it is designed to support.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Subjects will be blinded to product to be provided for visual and tactile definition of label product and type and frequency of prescription.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •IInclusion Criteria:
  • •Candidates will be healthy adults between 18 and 100 years of age
  • •Candidates will complete the consent briefing and consent documents prior to participating in any study activities.
  • •Phase II:Inclusion Criteria:
  • •Candidates will be between 50 and 100 years of age.
  • •Candidates will have a BCVA equal to or less than 20/70 or have central vision field less than 20 degrees.
  • •Candidates will complete the consent briefing and consent documents prior to participating in any study activities.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Candidates who do not complete the consent briefing and indicate consent through completion of consent documents with or without a witness (as indicated by their ability to read the documents for themselves out loud with whatever optical assistance necessary (large print, magnification, optical correction, etc.), prior to any study activity, will not be included in this study.
  • •History of prior non-compliance or the presence or history of psychiatric condition (including drug or alcohol addiction) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, make it difficult for the subject to comply with the study procedures or follow the investigators instructions.
  • •Candidates under 50 years or older than 100 years of age will be excluded.
  • •Candidates with a BCVA better than 20/70 or have central vision field greater than 20 degrees, will be excluded.
  • •Candidates with comorbidities that in the opinion of the investigator confound their ability to complete the assessments in this study (ie. Advanced neuropathy of the hands, dementia, or mental incapacity) will be excluded.
  • •Candidates who do not complete the consent briefing and indicate consent through completion of consent documents with or without a witness (as indicated by their ability to read the documents for themselves out loud with whatever optical assistance necessary (large print, magnification, optical correction, etc.), prior to any study activity, will not be included in this study.
  • •History of prior non-compliance or the presence or history of psychiatric condition (including drug or alcohol addiction) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, make it difficult for the subject to comply with the study procedures or follow the investigators instructions.

Arms & Interventions

Phase I- Visually Obscured Healthy Subjects

Sham Comparator

Tactile label to be evaluated by healthy subjects without visual defect. Subjects in visually obscuring lenses but without peripheral neuropathies or other tactile deficits will evaluate the tactile labeling product for efficacy in drug identity and dosing definition. .

Intervention: Tactile Labels for Drug identity and dose frequency (Device)

Phase II- Low Vision Over 50 years of age

Active Comparator

Subjects with documented Low Vision of 20/70 or less or visual field less than 20 degrees will be asked to evaluate tactile labeling product for efficacy in drug identity and dosing definition.

Intervention: Tactile Labels for Drug identity and dose frequency (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Correct Drug Identity by Shape

Time Frame: 2 minutes

Subjects Assessment and Report of drug identity by shape of label protrusions

Correct Drug Identity by Color

Time Frame: 2 minutes

Subject Assessment and Report of drug identity by color of tactile label

Correct Dose Frequency by Tactile Protrusions

Time Frame: 2 minutes

Subject Assessment and Report of Drug Dosing frequency by number of protrusions of tactile label

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials