Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06363058
NCT06363058UnknownNot Applicable

Effect of Combined ES Cycling Training on Individuals With SCA

Chang Gung University1 site in 1 country145 target enrollmentStarted: April 8, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
145
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Overall Response Time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To focuses on the challenges faced by individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), highlighting the major clinical sign of ataxia that affects their stability and ability to perform daily activities, thereby impacting their quality of life. It outlines the concept of neural plasticity, which is the brain's ability to adapt through changes in excitability, and notes that these changes are more enduring in the central nervous system (CNS) than in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). This adaptability, crucial for memory and motor learning, is compromised in SCA patients due to impaired brain areas and pathways. The summary further delves into motor learning, distinguishing between explicit and implicit learning, and points out that SCA patients exhibit deficiencies in procedural learning and cerebellar function. It also introduces the concept of priming as a preparatory mechanism that can enhance the effectiveness of physical therapy by modifying subsequent responses to stimuli. The document suggests that cycling, as an aerobic exercise, could prime the brain for improved blood flow and oxygenation, thereby supporting synaptic plasticity and the release of beneficial neurotrophic factors. Finally, the project aims to deepen the understanding of motor performance and learning mechanisms in SCA patients and apply these insights to clinical rehabilitation strategies.

Detailed Description

Ataxia is the major clinical sign of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) patients. Increased postural sway and instability during volitional movements appear and hinder SCA patients from performing normal daily life activities and influence quality of life of victims.

Neural plasticity comes from excitability changes. Changes in excitability produced by repetitive activities at synapses maintain a longer time in the central nervous system (CNS) than the changes in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The long duration of synaptic excitability changes may be linked to memory and motor learning. Neural plasticity could be investigated by several non-invasive instruments, such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). The excitability is suppressed in SCA patients due to corrupted brain areas and pathways.

Motor learning is the process of obtaining the capability for movement. Motor learning is not merely focusing on changes in performance during practice but also being evaluated during retention and/or transfer. Motor learning can be divided into explicit and implicit learning. One type of implicit learning is the acquisition of motor skills, often referred to as procedural learning. Serial reaction time task (SRTT) is used to describe implicit sequence motor learning. A series of implicit motor sequence learning tasks is to clarify the role and function of the cerebellum. And this function is deficient in SCA patients.

Priming is an unconscious process associated with learning to alter the later response by the proceeding stimulus. Priming is applied to physical therapy; it could result in behavioral change and strengthen the training effect afterward.

Cycling could be an aerobic exercise priming that may help to raise brain blood flow and oxygenation, facilitate synaptic plasticity, augment the release of neurotrophic factors, to transmit neuroendocrine and myokines.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Health subjects:

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Musculoskeletal injuries on legs.
  • •Osteoporosis.
  • •SCA subjects:
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •- Clinical diagnosis of SCA.
  • •Exclusion Criteria:
  • •Musculoskeletal injuries on legs
  • •Osteoporosis.
  • •Any peripheral or central nervous system injury or disease patients.

Arms & Interventions

Stage 1: Healthy people

No Intervention

To establish a baseline and ensure reliability, and to develop a training protocol for stage 3.

Stage 2: Short-term training SCA people

Experimental

Short-term ES Cycling Training

Intervention: ES Cycling Training (Other)

Stage 2: SCA Control group

No Intervention

Control Group

Stage 3:Long-term training SCA people

Experimental

Long-term ES Cycling Training

Intervention: ES Cycling Training (Other)

Stage 3: SCA Control group

No Intervention

Control group

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall Response Time

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The sum of reaction time and movement time, providing a complete measure of the time taken from the stimulus presentation to the completion of the response. Unit: Second(s)

Overall Error Rate

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The total proportion of incorrect responses across a testing session or series of tasks.

Total Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

To objectively assess ataxia severity across various domains of motor function including gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel-shin slide. Each item is scored individually with a scale that typically ranges from 0 (no ataxia) to a maximum score that depends on the severity and the aspect of ataxia being assessed. The total score ranges from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

Step Length

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

The linear distance between the two ankles, typically expressed in centimeter(cm).

Total Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

To measure an individual's balance abilities through various tasks that mimic daily activities, assessing the risk of falls and overall balance proficiency. The BBS consists of 14 items that evaluate a range of functions including sitting to standing, standing unsupported, transferring, turning to look behind, picking up an object from the floor, and standing on one leg. Each task is rated on a scale from 0 (unable) to 4 (independent), with the total score ranging from 0 to 56. A higher total score indicates better balance and lower fall risk. Scores below 45 are generally indicative of increased fall risk.

Walking Speed

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

The time taken by participants to walk a standardized distance, typically expressed in centimeters per second (cm/s).

Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

MEPs are the electrical responses recorded from muscles following stimulation of the motor cortex. They reflect the efficiency of neural transmission from the cortex to the muscle. Unit: millivolts (mV).

Intracortical Facilitation (ICF)

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

ICF is measured by applying a pair of TMS pulses with a short interval (e.g., 8-15 ms) where the first (subthreshold) pulse is followed by a second (suprathreshold) pulse, leading to an increased amplitude of the MEP.

Total Time to Complete the Time Up and Go test (TUG test)

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

The time, in seconds, it takes for a participant to complete the TUG test from the initial sitting position to returning to the seated position. An older adult who takes ≥12 seconds to complete the TUG is at risk for falling.

Intracortical Inhibition (ICI)

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

ICI is measured similarly to ICF but with a shorter inter-stimulus interval (e.g., 1-5 ms), resulting in a suppressed MEP amplitude. This suppression reflects inhibitory processes within the cortex.

Step Time

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

The duration taken for one complete step, measuring from foot-off of one foot to the next foot-off of the same foot, usually expressed in seconds.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Stance Time(Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.)
  • Cadence(Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.)
  • Single Support Time(Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.)
  • Swing Time(Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.)
  • Double Support Time(Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ya-Ju Chang

Professor

Chang Gung University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials