Comparison of Postoperative QoR-15 Scores Between Sevoflurane and Remimazolam
- Conditions
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05019222
- Lead Sponsor
- Gangnam Severance Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the quality of recovery (QoR)-15 scores according to the use of maintenance anesthetics in the cervical spine surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been known to help reducing risks of postoperative nausea/vomiting and malignant hyperthermia. However, it is still not enough to explain which is better between TIVA or inhalation anesthesia. In particular, there is no study to investigate overall postoperative functional recovery via QoR-15 in patients receiving TIVA with remimazolam. The hypothesis of the investigators study is that, in patients with cervical spine surgery, total intravenous anesthesia based on remimazolam can improve the the quality of recovery compared to inhalation anesthesia based on sevoflurane.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 72
- Adult patients who aged 20-70 years
- ASA-PS: 1-3
- BMI < 30
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery
- Tolerance or hypersensitivity to benzodiazepine
- Dependence or addiction to psychotropic drugs or alcohol
- Pregnant women, subjects who lack the ability to make decisions and susceptible to voluntary participation decisions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm 1) Sevoflurane group Sevoflurane based inhalation anesthesia Sevoflurane based inhalation anesthesia Arm 2) Remimazolam group Remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia Remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference between two groups (sevoflurane vs. remimazolam) in QoR-15 scores postoperative day 1 The difference of scores in the Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 survey on POD 1 Total 0-150, 0 (minimum), 150 (maximum), Higher scores means better.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Myung Hwa Kim
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of