MedPath

Comparison of Postoperative QoR-15 Scores Between Sevoflurane and Remimazolam

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05019222
Lead Sponsor
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the quality of recovery (QoR)-15 scores according to the use of maintenance anesthetics in the cervical spine surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been known to help reducing risks of postoperative nausea/vomiting and malignant hyperthermia. However, it is still not enough to explain which is better between TIVA or inhalation anesthesia. In particular, there is no study to investigate overall postoperative functional recovery via QoR-15 in patients receiving TIVA with remimazolam. The hypothesis of the investigators study is that, in patients with cervical spine surgery, total intravenous anesthesia based on remimazolam can improve the the quality of recovery compared to inhalation anesthesia based on sevoflurane.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
72
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients who aged 20-70 years
  • ASA-PS: 1-3
  • BMI < 30
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • Tolerance or hypersensitivity to benzodiazepine
  • Dependence or addiction to psychotropic drugs or alcohol
  • Pregnant women, subjects who lack the ability to make decisions and susceptible to voluntary participation decisions

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1) Sevoflurane groupSevoflurane based inhalation anesthesiaSevoflurane based inhalation anesthesia
Arm 2) Remimazolam groupRemimazolam based total intravenous anesthesiaRemimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The difference between two groups (sevoflurane vs. remimazolam) in QoR-15 scorespostoperative day 1

The difference of scores in the Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 survey on POD 1 Total 0-150, 0 (minimum), 150 (maximum), Higher scores means better.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Myung Hwa Kim

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath