ISRCTN39871601已完成不适用
A prospective randomised comparison of I-gel and LMA-unique Supraglottic Airway Devices for use during Clinical Anaesthesia
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health0 个研究点目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2007年9月28日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 300
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1. ASA I or II patients (fit and healthy or with minor well-controlled chronic disease)
- •2. Age 16-70 years
- •3. Weight 30-120 kg
- •4. Not pregnant
- •5. Booked for elective surgery of duration <2 hours
- •7. Normal airway assessment
- •8. Consenting
排除标准
- •1. Age <16 or >80, or weight <30 or >120kg
- •2. Pregnancy
- •3. Emergency surgery
- •4. Surgery > 2 hours duration
- •5. Patient not fit (ASA >=III)
- •6. Patient not starved
- •7. History of symptomatic reflux disease
- •8. History of difficult airway mgmt during previous anaesthesia
- •9. Anticipated difficult airway
- •10. Previous radiotherapy to head/neck
- •11. Heavy smokers >20 cigarettes/d
- •12. Non-consenting
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
Unknown
A comparative study between I-gel and LMA Blockbuster in terms of safety and efficacyCTRI/2023/06/053450Pacific medical college and hospital
已完成
Unknown
Comparing Three Supraglottic Airway Devices in adult patients undergoing General AnesthesiaCTRI/2023/11/060186Sardar Patel Medical Collage Bikaner Rajasthan100
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of the clinical performance of I gel and Ambu Aura Gain supra glottic airway devices in paediatric patients under controlled ventilation.CTRI/2019/05/019126Ashka V Surve
尚未招募
2 期
â??A Comparative study between i-gel and Proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study.�?CTRI/2022/04/041674Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences
尚未招募
3 期
Comparing I-gel versus LMA Proseal regarding airway management in controlled hypertensive patients.CTRI/2019/05/018929Tanuka Mandal