A comparative study between I-gel and LMA Blockbuster in terms of safety and efficacy
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/053450
- Lead Sponsor
- Pacific medical college and hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Adult patients aged between 18 to 60 years.
2. Patients of either sex.
3. ASA class I and II
4. Mallampati grade I and II
5. patients weighing between 30-70 kgs.
6. Elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia with controlled ventilation.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with ASA Grade III, IV, V.
2. Mallampatti grade III And IV
3.Mouth opening < 2 cm
4.Oral pathology
5.Pregnant females
6.Head and neck surgeries
7.Predicted difficult airway
8.Patients with increased risk of aspirations
9.Patients with cervical spine disease
10.Obese patients with body mass index <30 kg and
>70kg
11.History of upper respiratory tract infections
12.Patients with obstruction of the airway beyond
the larynx
13.Patients with abnormal or distorted anatomy of
larynx
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Ease of insertion. <br/ ><br>2.No. of attempts made for sucessful insertion of device. <br/ ><br>3.Time taken for insertion <br/ ><br> of device. <br/ ><br>4.Oropharyngeal seal pressure. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1.Ease of insertion. <br/ ><br>2.No. of attempts made for sucessful insertion of device. <br/ ><br>3.Time taken for insertion of device. <br/ ><br>4.Oropharyngeal seal pressure. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Adverse effects. <br/ ><br>2.Post operative complications.Timepoint: 24 months