Comaparison of 2 blocks using local anaesthetics for pain management after breast surgery
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified siteHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/02/049721
- Lead Sponsor
- VIMSAR
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Female patients posted for modified radical mastectomy surgery under general anaesthesia
2. Age 18 -60 years
3.Weight 40 -80 kg
4. ASA grade I and II.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patient refusal
2. Patients with history of allergy to any medication
3. Preoperative HR < 45/min
4.H/o pre-existing chronic pain
5. Patients using antihypertensive drug like clonidine (a2 adrenergic agonist)
6. Renal or hepatic insufficiency
7. Patients with bleeding disorders
8. Patients with psychiatric disorders
9. Nerve block site infection
10. Pt with H/o of AV block
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK IS BETTER THAN SERRATUS ANTERIOR PLANE BLOCK FOR INTRAOPERATIVE AND POST OPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENTTimepoint: ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK IS BETTER THAN SERRATUS ANTERIOR PLANE BLOCK FOR INTRAOPERATIVE AND POST OPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT BY ASSESSING VAS SCORE AT 2,4 ,6 ,12,24 HOURS
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK REQURIES LESS ANALGESIC CONSUMPTION IN 24 HRS AND HAS FEWER SIDE EFFECTS COMPARED TO SERRATUS ANTERIOR PLANE BLOCKTimepoint: 2, 4, 6 ,12 ,24 HRS