Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04743167
NCT04743167Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

IVF Versus Surgery for the Treatment of Infertility Associated to Ovarian and Deep Peritoneal Endometriosis

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico3 sites in 1 country206 target enrollmentStarted: March 16, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
206
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Live birth rate from pregnancies started within 12 months since randomization

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The management of endometriosis-related infertility remains controversial. In particular, there is an equipoise for infertile women with endometriotic lesions detected at ultrasound. These women can be managed with either surgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF). The two approaches radically differ and they have never been compared with a randomized trial. As a consequence, affected women currently receive contrasting information and the mode of treatment substantially differ among centres, reflecting the local expertise of physicians rather than clinical needs.

The present study aims at clarify whether IVF could be superior to surgery in infertile women with endometriotic lesions detected at ultrasound. This topic will be addressed comparing the two approaches in terms of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the study will disentangling whether the endometriosis-related systemic inflammatory mechanisms may have an impact on the quality of folliculogenesis and on IVF outcomes. This specific objective will be pursued through the characterization and analysis of circulating extracellular vesicles (EV)-immunologic, proteomic and miRNA signatures and measurement of steroid hormones in follicular fluid.

Detailed Description

Women accepting to enter the study will be randomized to either surgery and then natural pregnancy seeking or a program of three complete IVF cycles (i.e. three oocytes retrievals regardless of the number of embryo transfers performed). The initial time point will be the time of randomization. Women of both study groups will initiate treatment (surgery or IVF) in a shortest delay, maximum 3 months. Only live birth pregnancies and initiating within a 12-months period starting from this time point will be included in the primary outcome.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 39 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age < 40 years
  • •Pregnancy seeking for more than 12 months
  • •Regular menstrual cycle, i.e. mean cycle interval between 21 and 35 days
  • •Ultrasonographic diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas or deep peritoneal endometriosis.
  • •Normal seminal analysis based on WHO criteria
  • •Absence of ureteral stenosis or intestinal subocclusive symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Previous surgery for endometriosis
  • •Previous IVF cycles
  • •Contraindication to pregnancy
  • •Hydrosalpinx
  • •Endometriomas with a mean diameter > 4 cm
  • •Submucosal fibroids or large intramural or subserosal fibroids (≥ 5 cm).
  • •Doubtful sonographic findings that do not allow to reliably rule out malignancy.
  • •Obstacles to regular sexual intercourses (sexual disturbances or logistic problems)

Arms & Interventions

Surgery

Active Comparator

Patients undergoing surgery for endometriosis, after surgery, will receive indications for seeking for a natural pregnancy up to 12 months from the time of randomization

Intervention: Surgery (Procedure)

In Vitro Fertilization

Active Comparator

Patients included in the IVF arm will undergo three complete cycles of IVF (i.e. three oocytes retrievals regardless of the number of embryo transfers)

Intervention: IVF (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Live birth rate from pregnancies started within 12 months since randomization

Time Frame: up to 12 months since randomization

to assess whether IVF is more effective than surgery in obtaining a live birth and, if so, what is the magnitude of this benefit

Secondary Outcomes

  • Detachment of inflammatory mediators that might interfere with IVF through analysis of extracellular vescicles (EV).(3 months)
  • Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the two different approaches in the treatment of endometriosis(12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials