comparison between 3D plates vs miniplate fixation in low condylar fractures

Not yet recruiting

Conditions: Medical and Surgical,

Registration Number: CTRI/2019/08/020526

Lead Sponsor: Asmita Unadkat

Brief Summary: To assess and compare the efficacy and stability of Trapezoidal 3D plates vs. double mini plate osteosynthesis

for fixation of mandibular condylar neck/head fractures.

To evaluate criteria perioperatively

**I) pre-operative evaluation**Occlusion

**Ii) intra-operative evaluation**Time/duration of surgery

**Iii) post-operative evaluation**

**Clinical evaluation-**Pain Occlusion Infection

**Radiographic evaluation**- Hardware failure Malunion/non-union

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Not Yet Recruiting

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

Patient with low condylar (condylar base/neck) fracture of mandible.

Exclusion Criteria

Condylar head fracture (intracapsular) Paediatric patients Patients unfit for surgery Patient who could not be followed up post operatively for minimum 6 months.

Study & Design

Study Type: Observational

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To conclude efficacy of fixation between Trepezoidal plate and miniplate in mandibular low-	3rd post-operative day \| After 1 week \| After 6 weeks \| After 3 months \| After 6 months
Condylar (condylar base/neck) fractures.	3rd post-operative day \| After 1 week \| After 6 weeks \| After 3 months \| After 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To conclude efficacy of fixation between Trepezoidal plate and miniplate in mandibular low-	Condylar (condylar base/neck) fractures.

Trial Locations

Locations (1): Manipal college of dental sciences
🇮🇳
Udupi, KARNATAKA, India
Manipal college of dental sciences
🇮🇳Udupi, KARNATAKA, India
Dr Asmita
Principal investigator
9714714798
asmitaunadkat@gmail.com