MedPath

Carotid Artery Aneurysm Treatment Using CGuard Divert-And-Heal Strategy

Conditions
Carotid Artery Aneurysm
Interventions
Device: CGuard stent implantation
Registration Number
NCT04434456
Lead Sponsor
John Paul II Hospital, Krakow
Brief Summary

Non-randomized, single arm, open label, academic observational study of CGuard MicroNet covered stent system use to achieve endovascular lumen reconstruction in carotid artery aneurysms with indications for treatment (enlarging and/or dissecting / symptomatic).

Jagiellonian University Medical College research project.

Detailed Description

Carotid artery aneurysm (CAA) is a relatively infrequent, but significant clinical condition with numerous diagnostic and therapeutic implications. CAA affects laminal flow in the carotid artery implicating the risk of thrombus formation in the aneurysm cavity, and subsequent ischemic stroke from distal embolization. Another important clinical problem related to the CAA is a possible aneurysm dissection and rupture. Symptomatic CAA and increasing dimensions of CAA institute unquestioned indications for the CAA treatment.

Surgical carotid aneurysm repair bears a significant risk (periprocedural stroke, cranial nerve damage, carotid artery ligation). Therefore endovascular techniques of CAA exclusion were developed. Covered stents, stent-grafts, and combined stenting and aneurysm embolization with coils were applied. However, covered stents were demonstrated to increase the restenosis risk, and other complications such as CAA neck endo-leak.

Newer technique involves the flow diversion by implantation of stent in dense-structured stent (such as Wallstent) or stent-in-stent implantation. In this case a luminary flow dominates over aneurysm filling, which is limited by stent structure. Gradual thrombosis and occlusion of aneurysm cavity and healing of aneurysm follows.This method disadvantage was related to necessity of double stent load and increased restenosis risk (double metal layer).

These issues were addressed only recently by the double layer mesh stents that demonstrate natural flow diverting capabilities. CGuard Stent system is a self-expandable stent covered with PET mesh (MicroNet) that prevents plaque protrusion into the vessel lumen. In addition, in low flow conditions MicroNet can act as the flow diverter. These stents are routinely implanted in elevated risk plaques in high reference centers in Europe.

Several published observations indicate the CGuard stent also demonstrates flow-diverting capabilities, but the systematic observation of such application was not performed.

C-HEAL is a non-randomized, single arm, open label academic observational study of CGuard stent implantation in carotid arteries in patients with symptomatic, dissecting or enlarging carotid artery aneurysm. Procedures are performed according to the center routine, with application of proximal or distal embolic protection device (if feasible), and standard pharmacotherapy according to the current guidelines.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients older than 18 years, eligible for endovascular carotid artery aneurysm treatment with Micronet covered stent per Vascular Team evaluation, according to local standards
  • Written, informed consent to participate
  • Agreement to attend protocol required (standard) follow up visits and examinations
Exclusion Criteria
  • Preferred treatment other than stenting (surgery or conservative treatment / observation) per Vascular Team evaluation
  • Life expectancy <1 year (e.g. active neoplastic disease).
  • Chronic kidney disease with creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL.
  • Myocardial infarction in 72 hours proceeding the stenting procedure (if possible, postponing the procedure)
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
  • Coagulopathy.
  • History of uncontrolled contrast media intolerance

Angiographic

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Carotid artery aneurysm confirmed on angiography - symptomatic, dissected or enlarging
  • Aneurysm eligible for endovascular treatment per Vascular Team evaluation (according to current standards, guidelines and study center practice)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuccessful true lumen engagement
  • Aneurysm neck anatomy precluding healthy-to-healthy coverage with stent
  • Anatomic variants precluding stent implantation
  • Mobile (free-floating) plaque elements in aorta or arteries proximal to target lesion

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CGuard stenting (interventional)CGuard stent implantationCGuard implantation in the carotid artery with aneurysm requiring intervention
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of successful aneurysm exclusion6 months

Successful aneurysm cavity exclusion and endovascular lumen reconstruction on routine, non-invasive CT angiography

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of procedural successPeri-procedural

Procedural success defined as: Technical success (successful MicroNet covered stent delivery and implantation with complete aneurysm necks coverage) and Clinical success (no complications)

Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in target vessel segment24 months

Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in ultrasound evaluation of target vessel segment (if amenable to duplex Doppler examination)

Number of peri-procedural complications48 hrs or until discharge

Any complications occurring up to 48 hours post procedure

Rate of clinical efficacy at 12 months12 months

Clinical efficacy defined as successful aneurysm exclusion and no procedure related complications

MACNE at 30 days30 days

MACNE at 30 days (death, stroke, myocardial infarction)

Rate of In-hospital MACNE (major adverse cardiac and neurological events)48 hrs or until discharge

In-hospital MACNE (death, stroke, myocardial infarction)

Rate of clinical efficacy at 6 months6 months

Clinical efficacy defined as successful aneurysm exclusion and no procedure related complications

Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in the target vessel segment6 months

Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in ultrasound evaluation of target vessel segment (if amenable to duplex Doppler examination)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, The John Paul II Hospital

🇵🇱

Kraków, Maloplska, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath