Comparison of radiographic results between short and conventional stem in bilateral total hip arthroplasty; A prospective randomized study
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- short stem survivalmetaphyseal stem survivalshort stemmetaphyseal stem
- Registration Number
- TCTR20140212004
- Lead Sponsor
- khon kaen hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
Inclusion Criteria
Bilateral hip osteoarthritis that need total hip arthroplasty both sides.
age >20 years
Exclusion Criteria
1) Previous osteotomy or fracture at proximal femur
2) Previous hip infection or surgery
3) Abnormal hip anatomy
4) Neuropathic hip
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umber of radiolucent zone around stem 5 years Follow-up every 6 months with radiography of both hips to observed
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Distribution of radiolucent around stem 5 years Follow-up every 6 months with radiography of both hips to observed
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What biomechanical factors influence metaphyseal stem survival in short vs. conventional total hip arthroplasty?
How do short stems compare to conventional stems in radiographic outcomes and implant longevity post-surgery?
Which patient-specific biomarkers predict better radiographic results with short stem hip arthroplasty?
What are the potential adverse events and management strategies for short stem implants in bilateral hip arthroplasty?
Are there alternative implant designs or materials that enhance metaphyseal stem integration compared to TCTR20140212004?