MedPath

Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment
Registration Number
NCT07027709
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical performance of laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks pretreated with BeautiBond Xtreme versus HC Primer, using BeautiLink SA cement. The study focuses on marginal adaptation, retention, discoloration, and recurrent caries over 18 months.

Detailed Description

This clinical trial compares two bonding protocols for hybrid ceramic laminate veneers. The veneers are fabricated from HC hard blocks and bonded using BeautiLink SA resin cement. One group receives BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment, while the other receives HC Primer. The study assesses marginal adaptation, retention, recurrent caries, and discoloration over 18 months to determine the superior clinical bonding protocol for these restorations.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria

dult patients ≥ 21 years requiring laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, vital or endodontically treated teeth, sufficient enamel, willing and able to consent and comply.

Exclusion Criteria

Periodontal disease, bruxism, poor hygiene, pregnancy, systemic illness, allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing trials, orthodontic treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary Outcome: Marginal AdaptationMeasured at 6, 12, 18 months.

(Modified USPHS)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Reham said el basty, professor
Contact
00201207169671
reham.elbasty@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.