Hybrid Ceramic on Worn Dentition Patients

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Dental Wear
• Interventions: Procedure: Hybrid composite nano-ceramic

• Registration Number: NCT04775823
• Lead Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

Brief Summary

Evaluation of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients.

Detailed Description

Composite resin is often used to restore patient's dental defficiency, and also the material to cover and protect weak tooth structure. In tooth wear patients, multiple factors attributing to destruct their teeth. The durability and strength of the resotrative material must be reinforced. Nanoceramic infiltrated in composite resin may enhance its mechanical characteristics. Therefore, hybrid composite-nanoceramic material may be effective for tooth wear patients.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2021-02-16
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-02-25
• Status Verified: 2021-03
• Study First Posted: 2021-03-01
• Study Start: 2021-03-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-03-02
• Last Update Posted: 2021-03-04
• Primary Completion: 2023-12-31
• Study Completion: 2023-12-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 50

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Hybrid composite nano-ceramic	Hybrid composite nano-ceramic	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Evaluation the change of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients.	3months, 6months, 12months, 24months, 36months	Participants with worn dentition dentition (attrition, erosion, abrasion, abfraction) were enrolled in the present study. They were restored with hybrid composite-nanoceramic resin(Cerasmart, GC Corporation).; During the follow up time, participants were examined with clinical photos, radiographic film, intraoral scans, and asked to fill in questionnaires. The questionnaires included subjective questionnaire with VAS scale and objective questionnaire according to FDI criteria.; The restorations were evaluated by two observers at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months according to the FDI criteria, which were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Restorations were scored for clinical acceptability. Scores 4 and 5 were recorded as clinically unacceptable, and scores 5 was recorded for clinically failed.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital; 🇨🇳 Taipei, Test2, Taiwan