Comparing a novel videolaryngoscope with conventional Glidescope® videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult airway: a manikin study
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Difficult airwayAnaesthesiology - Anaesthetics
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12618000271202
- Lead Sponsor
- Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot yet recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Anaesthetic residents, registrars or consultants who work at the Royal Melbourne Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria
No exclusion criteria
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The time taken for successful tracheal intubation [It is measured from the time the videolaryngoscope is handed to the participant to when the participant declare successful intubation, with censoring of failed intubation. It is recorded by an independent observer.]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umber of failed intubation [Failure is defined as unrecognized oesophageal intubation, abandoned procedure, intubation taking >120 seconds or > 3 attempts of intubation. It is recorded by an independent observer.];Number of intubation attempts [An attempt is defined as removal of videolaryngoscope or endotracheal tube from the mouth without declaration of successful intubation. It is recorded by an independent observer.];Number of intubating adjuncts used.[It is recorded by an independent observer at the time of intubation.];The best laryngoscopy view achieved using the Cormack and Lehane grading system (Grade I to IV).[It is recorded by an independent observer at the time of intubation.];The ease of intubation, which will be surveyed using a visual analogue scale from 0-100mm.[It is recorded by an independent observer at the time of intubation.];Type of intubating adjuncts used.[It is recorded by an independent observer at the time of intubation.]