MedPath

Cantharone for the Treatment of Perenial Warts

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Wart, Genital
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03625960
Lead Sponsor
Wayne State University
Brief Summary

Comparison of trichloroacetic acid versus cantharidine for the treatment of perenial warts.

Detailed Description

Warts are one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases. They are caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV) that causes cervical cancer. Warts can grow, obstruct labor, and spread. Patients presenting to the obgyn clinic with perenial warts were randomized to treatment with trichloroacetic acid (one of the many types of treatments) or to the treatment with cantharidine group. Cantharidine is a vesicant extracted from beetle bugs which painlessly causes a small blister to form and cures the patient from the HPV infection causing the wart . We compared cosmesis, scar formation, pain and number of treatments (visits) as well as effectiveness in both groups.

Objectives

1. Determine if cantharone is more effective than trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for removal of warts

2. Compare pain levels (pain during application) for each method

3. Compare patient satisfaction for each method

4. Compare scar formation and cosmesis for each method

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • Warts on the perenial area
  • Less than 4mm across.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy
  • Less than 18 years old
  • Lesions larger than 4 millimeters across
  • Unclear diagnosis
  • Internal warts
  • Diabetes
  • HIV
  • Warts within 2 cm of mucosal areas

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
trichloroacetic acid groupTrichloroacetic Acidapplication of trichloroacetic acid to perenial warts
Cantharidine groupCantharidinApplication of cantharidine to perenial warts
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain on treatmentat 30 minutes time point from application of treatment.

Comparison of pain when treatment is applied. The patient is asked on a scale of 0-5 (with 5 being extreme pain, 4 being severe pain, 3 being moderate, 2 being mild, 1 being slight and zero being no pain, how do you rate your pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of a patient's likelihood of using this method again as measured on a survey question2 weeks from starting therapy

A questionnaire given to the patient at the conclusion of the study and containing the question "on a scale from 1-5 (5 most likely) how likely are you to recommend this method to a friend or using it again yourself".

Presence of scarring or skin discoloration2 weeks from starting therapy

At the time of wart eradication, the treatment area is examined for healing. The clinician rates cosmesis on a scale from 0-5 with 5-skin grows back perfectly, 4-slight discoloration, 3-thickened skin, 1-slight scarring and 0-scarring.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath