Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
- Conditions
- HungerChild Nutrition Disorders
- Interventions
- Other: Food Insecurity Screening TabletOther: Food Insecurity Screening Verbal
- Registration Number
- NCT03656146
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Brief Summary
This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.
- Detailed Description
Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States, and economic hardships can compromise their development, negatively affect their overall health, and adversely affect their abilities to succeed in school and in life. Food insecurity (FI)-the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate or safe foods- while strongly associated with poverty, is an independent predictor of poor health outcomes for children.
The Emergency Department (ED) of academic medical centers often serves as a point of care entry for impoverished and high-risk families. Although there is a growing interest in the healthcare system's ability to address Social Determinants of Health (SDH), little is known about food insecurity in the pediatric ED. Additionally, there are limited data on how to implement FI screening into practice in a way that maximizes elicitation of social need, while assuring patient and family comfort.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1818
- English speaking
- Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department
- Patient (child) in critical condition
- Patient (child) >18 years of age
- Previously enrolled in study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Tablet Screening Food Insecurity Screening Tablet Food insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet Verbal Screening Food Insecurity Screening Verbal Food insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of Food Insecurity 12 months Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Preferred Screening Modality 4 weeks Report of screening modality preference: verbal, tablet, or no preference
Comfort level with screening location 4 weeks Report of comfort with screening in the emergency department and in the primary care setting
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States