MedPath

Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hunger
Child Nutrition Disorders
Interventions
Other: Food Insecurity Screening Tablet
Other: Food Insecurity Screening Verbal
Registration Number
NCT03656146
Lead Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Brief Summary

This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.

Detailed Description

Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States, and economic hardships can compromise their development, negatively affect their overall health, and adversely affect their abilities to succeed in school and in life. Food insecurity (FI)-the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate or safe foods- while strongly associated with poverty, is an independent predictor of poor health outcomes for children.

The Emergency Department (ED) of academic medical centers often serves as a point of care entry for impoverished and high-risk families. Although there is a growing interest in the healthcare system's ability to address Social Determinants of Health (SDH), little is known about food insecurity in the pediatric ED. Additionally, there are limited data on how to implement FI screening into practice in a way that maximizes elicitation of social need, while assuring patient and family comfort.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1818
Inclusion Criteria
  • English speaking
  • Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient (child) in critical condition
  • Patient (child) >18 years of age
  • Previously enrolled in study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Tablet ScreeningFood Insecurity Screening TabletFood insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet
Verbal ScreeningFood Insecurity Screening VerbalFood insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Presence of Food Insecurity12 months

Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Preferred Screening Modality4 weeks

Report of screening modality preference: verbal, tablet, or no preference

Comfort level with screening location4 weeks

Report of comfort with screening in the emergency department and in the primary care setting

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath