Improving Survivorship Care for Older Adults After Chemotherapy
- Conditions
- Survivorship
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment
- Registration Number
- NCT04405115
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Brief Summary
The researchers want to find out if older adults receiving a survivorship care plan followed by a geriatric assessment visit improves quality of life and satisfaction with care compared to receiving only a survivorship care plan for older adults who have completed chemotherapy for cancer treatment.
- Detailed Description
This study is a pilot randomized trial to examine whether a geriatric assessment-enhanced survivorship care plan improves satisfaction, knowledge and health-related quality of life compared to standard survivorship care plans among older adults who have completed curative chemotherapy for cancer. The investigator's hypothesis is that older adults who receive a geriatric assessment-enhanced survivorship care plan will report improved satisfaction with care, health-related quality of life, and knowledge and preparedness for survivorship care needs.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
- age 65 years and above and
- Have diagnosis of cancer and have completed chemotherapy with curative (not palliative) intent and
- have been scheduled to receive a survivorship care plan from an oncology navigator.
- advanced dementia or serious cognitive impairment that would impede ability to participate in the interview
- nursing home resident.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Active comparator arm Geriatric Assessment those that will be scheduled for comprehensive geriatric assessment with a geriatric nurse practitioner or physician
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of months needed for completion of trial enrollment 4-6 months Acceptability of the study: survey 4-6 months Assess acceptability via a short survey administered to participating oncology nurse navigators and patients selected for the intervention group.
Study retention rate 4-6 months Feasibility of the study will be assessed by study retention rate which is defined as proportion of enrolled participants who remain enrolled until study completion.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient satisfaction assessment by PSCC (Patient Satisfaction with Cancer related Care) tool 4-6 months PSCC items are rated on 5-point Likert scales: "1 = Strongly Agree", "2 = Agree", "3 = Neutral", "4 = Disagree", and "5 = Strongly Disagree". A lower PSCC total score indicates higher satisfaction level
Health related quality of life assessment by QLQ14 4-6 months QLQ-ELD14 is a validated quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients aged ⩾70 years and it is used in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-30.QLQ-ELD14 comprises five scales (mobility, worries about others, future worries, maintaining purpose and burden of illness) and two single items (joint stiffness and family support)
Self rated patient knowledge and preparedness measured by PLANS assessment tool (Preparing for Life as a New Survivor) 4-6 months Preparing for Life as a New Survivor (PLANS) survey is utilized to evaluate survivor satisfaction with 1) own knowledge of diagnosis, treatment, and side effects, and 2) communication with the cancer team regarding diagnosis, treatment, and side effects.PLANS questions assess the level of agreement with statements regarding satisfaction with a 4-point scale (strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree) for each statement.
Health related quality of life assessment by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-30 4-6 months The QLQ-C30 questionnaire is a specific questionnaire for cancer, it is composed of 30 questions or items that assess the quality of life in relation to physical, emotional, social aspects and in general the level of functionality of patients diagnosed with cancer. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire is assigned values between 1 and 4 (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: a lot, 4: a lot) according to the patient's responses to the item, only in items 29 and 30 are assessed with score from 1 to 7 (1: bad, 7: excellent). The scores obtained are standardized and a score between 0 and 100 is obtained, 0 being the worst possible and 100 the best.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Community Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Clovis, California, United States