MedPath

Effectiveness Comparison Between Continuous Cryotherapy and Ice Pack Therapy After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Postoperative Pain, Acute
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Cryotherapy Effect
Interventions
Procedure: Conventional ice treatment
Procedure: Continuous compression cryotherapy
Registration Number
NCT06629285
Lead Sponsor
University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)
Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial study conducted by comparing the VAS score, swelling condition, knee ROM and patient's satisfactory score between applying ice pack cold therapy and applying continuous compressive cryotherapy in a postoperative three-day period of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
72
Inclusion Criteria
  • Having anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • Agree to be enrolled in study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Complex knee injury
  • Raynard's disease
  • Sensitive to low temperature
  • Do not want to use cryotherapy
  • Have vascular disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional ice treatmentConventional ice treatment-
Continuous compression cryotherapyContinuous compression cryotherapy-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analog Scale3 days postoperative

Compare postoperative Pain score

Knee effusion3 days postoperative

Compare knee swelling rate

Knee range of motion3 days postoperative

Range of motion in knee postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh city

🇻🇳

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath