Rewards for Cannabis Abstinence-study
- Conditions
- Cannabis Use Disorder
- Registration Number
- NCT05836207
- Lead Sponsor
- Parnassia Addiction Research Centre
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of contingency management (CM) compared with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD) in youth (16-22 years).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What is the efficacy of 12 weeks outpatient CM versus CBT in youths with a CUD, in terms of cannabis abstinence during the intervention period?
* What is the long-term efficacy of CM versus CBT at 6- and 12-months follow-up (FU)?
* What is the cost-effectiveness of CM versus CBT at 12-months FU from a societal perspective?
Study hypotheses are:
1. CM will result in more cannabis-abstinent days than CBT during the intervention; 2. CM is more effective and cost-effective than CBT at 12 months follow-up.
Eligible patients (n=154) will be randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of outpatient CM or CBT. Assessments are conducted by trained research-assistants at baseline, after 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, and twice-weekly during treatment and consist of questionnaires, a computer task and collection of urine samples. Primary endpoint is the number of biochemically verified cannabis abstinent days in the 12-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoint: Treatment response: 50% or more reduction in cannabis use days in the past 4 weeks, compared with baseline.
The primary outcome will be modelled in the intention-to-treat population in a (negative binomial) regression analysis with treatment group as independent variable and stratification variables as covariates.
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis (CEA; CUA) will be performed from a societal perspective. CEA: Treatment response is the central clinical endpoint for calculations of incremental costs per responder. CUA: Incremental costs per QALY (based on EuroQoL).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 154
- Youths (16-22 years) seeking treatment for a primary CUD
- Regular cannabis use (≥14 days) in past 4 weeks
- Intention to cease cannabis use during intervention
- Able and willing to attend the treatment center and submit urine samples under supervision twice-weekly
- Informed consent.
- Health contra-indications (e.g., acute psychosis/suicidality)
- Insufficient Dutch language.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cannabis-abstinent days (biochemically verified) 12 weeks Number of biochemically verified cannabis-abstinent days during the 12-week intervention period
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incremental costs per QALY 52 weeks Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gains based on the The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)
long-term 'treatment response' 52 weeks defined as 50% or more reduction in cannabis use days in the 4 weeks preceding week 12 (end-of-treatment), and week 26 and 52, compared with baseline.
Incremental costs per treatment responder 52 weeks Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per treatment responder (see above) will be determined based on the incremental costs and effects of CM compared with CBT.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Antes Youz
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Netherlands
Brijder
🇳🇱the Hague, Netherlands
Novadic-Kentron
🇳🇱Vught, Netherlands
Antes Youz🇳🇱Rotterdam, NetherlandsHester de GooijerContact