跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04099095
NCT04099095撤回不适用

PROSPECT: A Mental Health Social Prescribing Trial (British Red Cross)

University of South Wales2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2020年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from base-line. EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

Social prescribing is a way of understanding the things that are important to a person and then using these to find groups and resources in their local community that can help them meet their goals and understand their problems. Social prescribing can be used with people who have physical health problems, mental health problems, social problems such as loneliness or financial/housing problems.

The Welsh Government has supported the creation of these social prescribing services across Wales. However, the evidence showing that social prescribing is a good way of improving a person's well-being and quality of life is not very strong.

This project is an evaluation of a new social prescribing service delivered by British Red Cross in two areas in Wales. British Red Cross have made a new social prescribing service, where a link worker works with a patient who has mild/moderate mental or emotional health problems, to understand their needs and set them goals for the future over 12 weeks of core support. The link worker will also help them find services in their local community that might help them achieve their goals.

The study uses a waitlist trial, thus some participants will get to meet the link worker and have the intervention straight away, while others will have to wait for 20 working days. From this, the researchers can compare the people who had the intervention straight away with the people who had to wait. Scores on well-being and quality of life questionnaires will be used to see the effects of the intervention on participants.

详细描述

Social prescribing is an umbrella term to describe ways of linking people to sources of community-based, non-medical support. There is no fixed definition of social prescribing.

In Wales, social prescribing has many models which require the NHS and third sector organisations to work closely together. These involve referral to a link worker/community connector/social prescriber from primary care or another referral route, such as social work or housing. These roles all practice social prescribing, which includes a 'what matters' conversation, co-productive goal setting, motivational interviewing and coaching, followed by referral to third sector and community groups/professionals for support and activity to meet the person's individual goals.

Social prescribing is being widely implemented and has support from Welsh Government. However, there is limited research evidence to judge its effectiveness, who benefits (if at all) and its value for money. Public Health Wales identified gaps in the published evidence for social prescribing, particularly in the evaluation of social prescribing projects in primary care in Wales. It is therefore important to employ more rigorous and high-quality methods to evaluating social prescribing interventions in the community.

As part of a Welsh Government Third Sector grant for delivering a social prescribing pilot with a focus on mental health, British Red Cross are undertaking a research project in two localities in Wales, Caerphilly and Pembrokeshire, to create and test a model of social prescribing. As part of this initiative, a link worker will work with the individual over a 12-week period to discuss their needs, goals and future steps. A link worker helps the individual to explore extra services that may support them in improving their health, sense of wellness and independence by providing practical and emotional support.

This study will conduct an evaluation alongside the implementation and delivery of the British Red Cross social prescribing intervention, using a randomised waitlist evaluation method. Participants will either receive the social prescribing intervention within 5 days of giving consent, or 20 working days after consent and baseline data collection. This will allow the researchers to draw comparisons between the immediate intervention group and the waitlist controls, who continue to receive usual care. This will also provide a more robust evidence base for social prescribing interventions. The study will use measures of quality of life and wellbeing.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Primary care service users who are at the point of referral
  • Experiencing mild/moderate mental health and/or emotional wellbeing disorders( eg anxiety or depression)
  • Aged 18+ years
  • Registered with a General Practitioner in Wales

排除标准

  • Unable to give written informed consent
  • Unable to answer all questions (WEMWBS) at baseline
  • Worsening of mental health condition to the point where more intensive support is required

结局指标

主要结局

Change from base-line. EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire

时间窗: At Base-line, 4 weeks and 3 months after randomisation

The EQ-5D-5L Health questionnaire records the self-reported health using five sections: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each section receives a score ranging from 1 to 5, with a score of 5 providing the most ill-health. The minimum total score is 5 and the maximum 25. The lower the score the better the health of the participant. Part 2 of the questionnaire provides a self-reporting vertical visual analogue scale with the end points labelled, "The best health you can imagine" scoring 100 and "The worst health you can imagine", scoring 0.

Change from base-line. The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) Score

时间窗: At Base-line, 4 weeks and 3 months after randomisation

SWEMWBS is completed by the participants and allows self-reflection on mental well-being before and during involvement in health enhancing activities. Each of the 7 statement can be scored from 1 to 5, from 'none of the time' to 'all of the time'. A total score is calculated by summing the 7 individual statement scores. The minimum score is 7 and the maximum is 35. The higher score signifies better mental well-being.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验