BIA Guided-fluid Management in Postinjury Open Abdomen
- Conditions
- Damage ControlTrauma AbdomenAcute Compartment Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: BIA-guided fluid resuscitation protocolOther: Traditional fluid resuscitation protocol
- Registration Number
- NCT03466684
- Lead Sponsor
- Nanjing PLA General Hospital
- Brief Summary
Fluid overload (FO), resulting from high volume fluid therapy, is frequent and contributes to excessive visceral edema, delayed fascial closure, and adverse outcomes among postinjury open abdomen (OA) patients. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising tool in monitoring fluid status and FO. Thus, we sought to investigate the efficacy of BIA-directed resuscitation among postinjury OA patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 140
- Adult trauma patients admitted to SICU with OA after emergent abbreviated laparotomy were considered eligible.
- (a) age less than 18 years; (b) pregnancy; (c) lactation; (d) limb amputations; (e) mental disorders; (f) diabetes mellitus; (g) pre-existing blood disorders; (h) pre-existing abdominal fistulas; (i) pre-existing terminal illness; (j) liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C); (k) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV; (l) chronic renal failure requiring dialysis; (m) therapy with an extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO); (n) enrolled in an ongoing, interventional RCT; (o) received prior fluids for resuscitation during their ICU stay; (p) expected to die within 1 hour of ICU admission for devastating injuries; (q) activated opt-out process for BGFM trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description BIA-directed fluid resuscitation BIA-guided fluid resuscitation protocol After the achievement of CVP, MAP and ScvO2 goals, if hyperhydration (HL \> 74.3%) was found, then the following fluid management was applied with each passing 6h. If HL was above 87% (severe level), fluid infusion was restricted, a furosemide drip was used, and CRRT was initiated with an ultrafiltration rate when patients were failure or inadequate response to above diuretic therapy that gave a net negative fluid balance of at least 1500 ml during the next 6h. If HL was 81%-87% (moderate level), above methods were used to trigger a net negative fluid balance (about 1000 ml) for the next 6h. Similarly, If HL was 74.3%-81% (mild level), a net negative fluid balance of about 500 ml would be achieved during the next 6h of ICU hospitalization. If HL was blow 71%, a state of dehydration, CVP, MAP, and ScvO2 was maintained as above during ICU resuscitation. Traditional fluid resuscitation Traditional fluid resuscitation protocol A timely restricted intravenous fluid regimen or dehydration therapy was implemented by two senior clinicians according to cumulative fluid balance recording and hemodynamic condition such as heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, urine output and body weight change.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of 30-day primary fascial closure 30 days Rate of 100% direct approximation of abdominal fascial edges
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to fascial closure 30 days Time to 100% direct approximation of abdominal fascial edges
Postoperative 7-day fluid volume 7 days Statistics of postoperative 7-day fluid volume Postoperative 7-day fluid fluid use during resuscitation
Postoperative 30-day mortality 30 days All cause mortality within 30 days
Postoperative 30-day adverse effects 30 days All cause adverse effects within 30 days