MedPath

BIA Guided-fluid Management in Postinjury Open Abdomen

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Damage Control
Trauma Abdomen
Acute Compartment Syndrome
Interventions
Other: BIA-guided fluid resuscitation protocol
Other: Traditional fluid resuscitation protocol
Registration Number
NCT03466684
Lead Sponsor
Nanjing PLA General Hospital
Brief Summary

Fluid overload (FO), resulting from high volume fluid therapy, is frequent and contributes to excessive visceral edema, delayed fascial closure, and adverse outcomes among postinjury open abdomen (OA) patients. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising tool in monitoring fluid status and FO. Thus, we sought to investigate the efficacy of BIA-directed resuscitation among postinjury OA patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
140
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult trauma patients admitted to SICU with OA after emergent abbreviated laparotomy were considered eligible.
Exclusion Criteria
  • (a) age less than 18 years; (b) pregnancy; (c) lactation; (d) limb amputations; (e) mental disorders; (f) diabetes mellitus; (g) pre-existing blood disorders; (h) pre-existing abdominal fistulas; (i) pre-existing terminal illness; (j) liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C); (k) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV; (l) chronic renal failure requiring dialysis; (m) therapy with an extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO); (n) enrolled in an ongoing, interventional RCT; (o) received prior fluids for resuscitation during their ICU stay; (p) expected to die within 1 hour of ICU admission for devastating injuries; (q) activated opt-out process for BGFM trial.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BIA-directed fluid resuscitationBIA-guided fluid resuscitation protocolAfter the achievement of CVP, MAP and ScvO2 goals, if hyperhydration (HL \> 74.3%) was found, then the following fluid management was applied with each passing 6h. If HL was above 87% (severe level), fluid infusion was restricted, a furosemide drip was used, and CRRT was initiated with an ultrafiltration rate when patients were failure or inadequate response to above diuretic therapy that gave a net negative fluid balance of at least 1500 ml during the next 6h. If HL was 81%-87% (moderate level), above methods were used to trigger a net negative fluid balance (about 1000 ml) for the next 6h. Similarly, If HL was 74.3%-81% (mild level), a net negative fluid balance of about 500 ml would be achieved during the next 6h of ICU hospitalization. If HL was blow 71%, a state of dehydration, CVP, MAP, and ScvO2 was maintained as above during ICU resuscitation.
Traditional fluid resuscitationTraditional fluid resuscitation protocolA timely restricted intravenous fluid regimen or dehydration therapy was implemented by two senior clinicians according to cumulative fluid balance recording and hemodynamic condition such as heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, urine output and body weight change.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of 30-day primary fascial closure30 days

Rate of 100% direct approximation of abdominal fascial edges

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to fascial closure30 days

Time to 100% direct approximation of abdominal fascial edges

Postoperative 7-day fluid volume7 days

Statistics of postoperative 7-day fluid volume Postoperative 7-day fluid fluid use during resuscitation

Postoperative 30-day mortality30 days

All cause mortality within 30 days

Postoperative 30-day adverse effects30 days

All cause adverse effects within 30 days

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath