跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2020/06/025831
CTRI/2020/06/025831尚未招募不适用

Evaluation of Alvarado scoring, RIPASA scoring and AIR scoring systems in acute appendicitis

Government Medical College1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 107 人开始时间: 2020年6月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
107
试验地点
1
主要终点
Estimate the predictive accuracy of Alvarado score and AIR score and RIPASA score against the reference standard of histopathology in patients undergoing emergency Appendicectomy

研究概览

简要总结

This is a DiagnosticAccuracy study which was carried out on 107 studies to find the predictiveaccuracy of Modified  Alvarado Scoring System(MASS) and two new systems namely Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR)score and Raja Isteri Pengiran AnakSaleha Appendicitis(RIPASA) score. Histopathology was set as thegold standard. We found that AIR and RIPASA scores had better diagnosticaccuracy as compared to MASS.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
12.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • •Patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis, defined as acute (1 week or less) non traumatic right iliac fossa pain consistent with a diagnosis of appendicitis (pain associated with nausea, anorexia, vomiting and fever along with clinical signs as tenderness and rebound tenderness in right iliac fossa, with or without ultrasound findings suggestive of appendicitis).

排除标准

  • •Pregnant females, patients with a right iliac fossa mass, patients with a previous history of urolithiasis or pelvic inflammatory disease,.

结局指标

主要结局

Estimate the predictive accuracy of Alvarado score and AIR score and RIPASA score against the reference standard of histopathology in patients undergoing emergency Appendicectomy

时间窗: 4 weeks after appendicectomy

次要结局

  • Find correlation between RIPASA, AIR and MASS(4 weeks after surgery)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验