Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between PIEB and CEI for Labour Epidural Analgesia

Phase 4

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Analgesia, Epidural

• Registration Number: NCT06889285
• Lead Sponsor: Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare safety and efficacy of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PEIB) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in parturients during active phase of labour.

The main questions aimed to answer are:

* Will parturient using PIEB+PCEA has lower incidence of motor block as compared to CEI during labour?

* Will parturient using PIEB + PCEA has lower local anaesthetic consumption (in mg/hr) as compared to CEI during labour?

* Will parturient using PIEB + PCEA has shorter duration of second stage labour as compared to CEI?

* Will parturient using PIEB + PCEA has better satisfaction score when compared to CEI during labour?

Participants will be randomised into PIEB group and CEI group after informed consent taken

* All participants will be taken baseline demographic data, vital signs, Bromage score, cardiotocograph prior intervention

* Labour epidural will be inserted and started on PIEB protocol or CEI protocol based on randomisation

* Participants vital signs and Bromage score will be recorded hourly till baby delivery

* In the end of delivery, total LA consumption and duration of second stage will be recorded

* Within 24 hours, participants will be interviewed on their satisfaction score on labour epidural analgesia.

Researchers will compare PIEB and CEI to see if PIEB has better safety and efficacy as compared to CEI in labour epidural analgesia.

Detailed Description

Parturient attending to labour room in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and requested for labour epidural analgesia will be screened and recruited into this clinical trial. Before participation, an informed consent will be taken from parturient.

PIEB + PCEA or CEI will be used on recruited participants based on the randomised group by primary investigator. Setup of epidural cocktail infusion pump either CADD-Solis ® pump or normal infusion pump, will be done by anaesthetic officer attending the patient.

For PIEB group, ropivacaine 0.05% + fentanyl 2mcg/ml in 100ml bag will be used for epidural analgesia. For CEI group, bupivacaine 0.1% + fentanyl 2mcg.ml in 50ml will be used for epidural analgesia. Both epidural cocktails are prepared by central pharmacist in sterile technique. Participants, researcher and the anaesthetist-in-charge can't be blinded from the study in view the CADD-Solis ® pump is unique with its PCEA bolus cord.

Prior procedure, participants baseline pain score, CTG, vital signs, Bromage score will be recorded prior to epidural catheter insertion. If CTG and vital signs are reassuring, then only anaesthetist-in-charge will proceed with epidural catheter insertion.

There will be assigned two groups of patients receiving different epidural regimen;

I. PIEB + PCEA group

This group patient will be inserted epidural catheter at L3/L4 or L4/L5 depending on anaesthetist-in-charge justification, epidural catheter will be kept 4-5 cm in epidural space and anchored with adhesive tape. A test dose of LA Lignocaine 2% 2ml will be given after epidural insertion. CADD-Solis infusion tubing will be primed in advance. Epidural catheter will be connected to epidural cocktail (Ropivacaine 0.05% + Fentanyl 2mcg/ml in 100ml mixture) with the protocol as below:

* Loading dose: 10ml

* Intermittent bolus: 10ml, bolus interval 1 hour, next bolus 1 hour

* PCEA dose: 10ml, lockout interval 10 minutes

II. CEI group This group of parturient will be inserted epidural catheter at L3/L4 or L4/L5 depending on anaesthetist-in-charge justification, epidural catheter will be kept 4-5 cm in epidural space and anchored with adhesive tape. Similarly, a test dose of LA Lignocaine 2% 2ml will be given after epidural insertion. Infusion tubing will be primed in advance. Epidural catheter will be connected to epidural cocktail (Bupivacaine 0.1% + Fentanyl 2mcg/ml in 50ml mixture) with the protocol as below: (directly extracted from Malaysia Pain management in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Procedure Guideline 2023)

* Loading dose 10 ml

* Continuous infusion: 10ml/hour

During epidural catheter insertion, inadvertent spinal catheterisation or dura puncture will be reported and manged to clinician justification, meanwhile patient will be withdrawn from this study.

Participant's CTG will be recorded after epidural catheterisation. After started on epidural analgesia, participants blood pressure will be recorded every 5 mins in first 30 mins, every 15 mins for another 30 mins, then every hourly subsequently. Participants' pain score will be recorded 15 mins after epidural analgesia started, then hourly recording of pain score using Visual Analogue Scale. Similarly, Bromage score will be recorded hourly by attending labour room nurse. This monitoring follows USM epidural analgesia monitoring protocol.

Any breakthrough pain requiring physician rescue will be attended by anaesthetist-in- charge, dose and amount of local anaesthetic agent given, time of breakthrough pain will be recorded in data collection sheet. If participants have unresolved labour pain despite physician rescue bolus of drug and unable to achieve pain score of \< 3, the catheter will be deemed ineffective, and the participant will be removed from the study.

Any adverse event, such as pruritus, nausea vomiting, maternal hypotension or high block will be recorded if applicable. In the end of delivery, the CADD-Solis pump/Infusion pump will be examined for total consumption of epidural cocktail in ml, its average hourly consumption, number of patient's self-administered PCEA bolus.

Obstetric and neonatal outcome, such as mode of delivery, indication for instrumental or Caesarean delivery, duration of second stage of labour and neonatal Apgar score at 1 and 5 mins will be documented in data collection sheet. The parturient will be interviewed within 24 hours of delivery by a different anaesthetist not involved in the study for overall assessment of her satisfaction with labour analgesia (graded on verbal scale from 0 = very dissatisfied to 100 = extremely satisfied)

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Study First Submitted: 2025-03-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-03-15
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-15
• Study First Posted: 2025-03-21
• Last Update Posted: 2025-03-21
• Study Start: 2025-04-01
• Primary Completion: 2025-08-30
• Study Completion: 2025-12-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 76

Inclusion Criteria

• age > 18 years old
• ASA 2 & 3w

Exclusion Criteria

• patient refusal
• significant comorbiddities, eg patient with heart disease, kidney diseae, neurological disoder
• contraindicated to neuraxial blockade
• allergic to local anesthetic agent or opioid
• obstetric complications, eg pre-eclampsia, leaking liqour, suspicious CTG
• morbid obesity, BMI > 40
• grandmultiparous ( > 5biths at > 20 weeks gestation)
• combined spinal epidural technique for labour epidural analgesia
• height < 145cm

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the incidence of motor block during labour between parturient with PIEB + PCEA and those with CEI.	1 year	Bromage score is measured hourly after epidural insertion. If there is any time when Bromage is greater than 0, then will be considered presence of motor block.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the duration of second stage labour between parturient with PIEB+CEA and those with CEI.	1 year	- From patient partogram, we will calculate duration of second stage labour for each patient (from cervical os 10cm till delivery of baby)
To compare the local anaesthetic consumption (in mg/hr) during labour between parturient with PIEB + PCEA and those with CEI	1 year	For PIEB+ PCEA group, the LA consumption will be retrieved from CADD-Solis pump which record total of LA use and number of patient's requested bolus. As for CEI group, its consumption can be derived from amount of LA given in the syringe and manual record where amount of physician bolus given.
To compare the satisfaction score during labour between parturient with PIEB+PCEA and those with CEI	1 year	Within 24 hours after delivery, parturient will be interviewed on the satisfaction score on the epidural regimen given with numerical rating scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is most unsatisfied and 100 is most satisfied.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Pakar Universiti Sains Malaysia; 🇲🇾 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia