Intervention to Change Attributions That Are Negative (ICAN)
- Conditions
- Brain InjuriesTrauma, BrainTraumatic Brain InjuryBrain, TraumaBrain Injuries, Traumatic
- Interventions
- Behavioral: ICAN
- Registration Number
- NCT03648476
- Lead Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Brief Summary
ICAN is the first treatment to target hostile attributions after TBI, making it a novel anger/ aggression management approach in this population. This is a randomized waitlist control trial. The length of time in the trial is approximately 15 weeks and the intervention is 6 weeks long.
- Detailed Description
ICAN is the first treatment to target hostile attributions after TBI, making it a novel anger/ aggression management approach in this population. Since the investigator's prior research shows that stronger hostile attributions are associated with poorer perspective taking,39 ICAN employs a unique perspective-positioning technique to train perspective taking and reduce hostile attributions. After recalling a personal situation in which others' ambiguous actions led to an unpleasant outcome, participants will explore different perspectives: sitting or standing in one position, s/he will explore his or her own thoughts and feelings (self-perspective), then move to a different position to experience the other person's perspective, eliciting their thoughts and feelings.
In 40 participants with TBI, we will conduct a Phase I, randomized waitlist controlled trial with 4 data collection points: Baseline; Week 1; Week 8 (post-treatment for ICAN; post-wait period for WLC); Week 15 (WLC post-treatment).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- History of complicated mild to severe TBI (injury due to an external physical force), with injury severity being defined either by Glasgow Coma Score at time of injury (≤12), or post-traumatic amnesia (≥1 day), or loss of consciousness (≥30 minutes), or positive head CT scan consistent with TBI.
- At least 18 years of age or older;
- ≥1 year post-injury;
- Have adequate vision, hearing, and speech/ language skills to participate in assessments and group therapy (determined based on interaction with the participant at screening)
- Have adequate reading comprehension (due to the primary assessment involving written scenarios)
- Have abnormal scores of negative attributions or perspective taking (determined at T0 screening)
- Have above average aggression (prescreened on telephone, and confirmed T0 screening).
- No anticipated medication changes for emotions/ behavior during length of study participation; medications for emotions/ behavior must be stable within last 30 days prior to consent at T0 (Screening)
- Have reliable mode of transportation
Exclusion criteria:
- Pre-morbid neurological disorders that could affect mood and cognition (e.g. stroke); does not include controlled seizures
- Progressive central nervous system disorders (e.g. dementia, Parkinson's)
- Developmental disability (e.g., autism, developmental delay);
- Major psychiatric disorders (e.g. schizophrenia, Borderline Personality Disorder);
- Severe Depression and/or perceived risk to self or others (mental health resources will be provided and if suicide risk, approved suicide protocol will be utilized);
- Currently receiving active behavioral therapy for anger.
- On drug research study for irritability, anger, aggression
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ICAN ICAN 6-week group therapy intervention with clinical RA comprised of 6 90-120 minute sessions beginning after Time 1 testing WLC: Waitlist Control ICAN WLC participants will delay treatment until after time two testing 8-weeks from time one testing. Participants will then begin 6 90-120 minute therapy sessions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire Score Change from Baseline at Week 8 and Week 15 The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (AQ), is a standardized measure comprised of 34 statements to assess total aggression, as well as the following aggression subconstructs: anger, hostile thoughts, and physical and verbal aggression. Participants rate statements using a 5-point Likert scale (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
Subscales are summed to compute a Total Aggression raw score and total Aggressions Scores were then converted to T scores (1-100) with a mean T-score =50 and Standard deviation=10 points.
Higher T-scores= more aggression/ worse outcome, thus a lower number indicates improvement Here, we are reporting the CHANGE in the group's MEAN t-score (e.g. Mean Post-test T score of 62 MINUS Mean Pre-test t score of 58 = Mean CHANGE score of -4, which means less aggression post-treatment). Thus, we are NOT reporting t-scores in this Results section; just the mean change of these scores. Negative scores indicate an improvement.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Global Impression of Change for Anger and Aggression Week 8 for participants randomized to ICAN or Week 15 for those randomized to WLC (administered after receiving treatment) The Global Impression of change for Anger and Aggression is a 1 item question that measures perceived change in anger and aggression Using a 7-point scale (1="no change" to "A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference"). Total Raw scores range from 1-7.Higher scores indicate greater change.
1. No change (or condition has gotten worse)
2. Almost the same, hardly any change at all
3. A little better, but no noticeable change
4. Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference
5. Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change
6. Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference
7. A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the differenceGlobal Impression of Change for Perspective Taking and Empathy Week 8 for participants randomized to ICAN or Week 15 for those randomized to WLC (administered after received treatment) The Global Impression of change for Perspective Taking and Empathy is a 1 item question that measures perceived change in Perspective Taking and Empathy using a 7-point scale (1="no change" to "A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference"). Total Raw scores range from 1-7.Higher scores indicate greater change.
1. No change (or condition has gotten worse)
2. Almost the same, hardly any change at all
3. A little better, but no noticeable change
4. Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference
5. Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change
6. Better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference
7. A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the differenceChange in Anger Affect Score Change from Week 1 at Week 8 and Week 15 The Anger-Affect Scale, from the PROMIS Anger, is a 5 item subjective questionnaire that requires participants to indicate the frequency with which they have been bothered by anger symptoms in the past week using a 5 point Likert scale (1.2,3,4,5). Total Raw scores range from 5-25. Higher scores indicate more severe anger; lower scores indicate lower levels of anger. Thus, a negative change score indicates a reduction in anger.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States