跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05861908
NCT05861908进行中(未招募)不适用

Impact of Placement Techniques on Three-year Clinical Performance of Class II Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations and Laboratory Investigation of Marginal Adaptation

Mansoura University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2021年5月9日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Esthetic Properties of restorations

研究概览

简要总结

The current study will be intended to evaluate and compare three-year clinical performance of class II bulk-fill resin composite restorations placed with different techniques.

详细描述

Fifty patients with proximal carious lesion in permanent molars were included in the study. A total eighty class II cavities were restored with one of the following bulk-fill resin composite with their adhesive systems (n=20) Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-aenial™ BULK Injectable or Sonicfill3. Double blinded randomized clinical trial with survival and clinical quality were evaluated at baseline, after 12 , 24 and 36months using modified FDI(Fédération dentaire internationale) World Dental Federation criteria

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Good general health
  • •Good oral hygienic
  • •Patient aging 18-35 year
  • •Patient available for follow-up visits compound class II (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal)
  • •Carious lesion in the external and middle third of dentin thickness
  • •ICDAS (International caries detection and assessment system) 4 or 5 that diagnosed clinically and radiographically.
  • •Maxillary or mandibular first or second molars
  • •Tooth with antagonist and adjacent mesial and distal tooth contact,
  • •Normal response to a vitality test.

排除标准

  • •Poor oral hygiene
  • •Severe or chronic periodontitis
  • •Heavy bruxism
  • •Occlusion fewer than 20 teeth
  • •Sensitivity to resin-based material.
  • •Patients with orthodontic treatment
  • •Patients on pregnancy or lactation
  • •chronic use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesic, and/or psychotropic drugs
  • •Patient potentially unable to attend recall visits
  • •Teeth would need direct pulp capping or
  • •Teeth act as abutment for fixed or removable prosthesis.

研究组 & 干预措施

Body Bulk-Fill

Experimental

20 cavity class II restored with Body bulk-fill Resin composite

干预措施: Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration (Other)

preheated Bulk-Fill

Experimental

20 cavity class II restored with preheated bulk-fill Resin composite

干预措施: Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration (Other)

Injectable Bulk-Fill

Experimental

20 cavity class II restored with injectable bulk-fill Resin composite

干预措施: G-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration (Other)

Sonic-Fill

Experimental

20 cavity class II restored with sonic-fill bulk-fill Resin composite

干预措施: Sonicfill3 restoration (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Esthetic Properties of restorations

时间窗: Three years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI(International Dental Federation) world dental federation is: 1. Surface luster 2. Staining 3. Color match and translucency 4. Esthetic and Anatomic form Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

Functional Properties of restorations

时间窗: Three years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI (International Dental Federation) world dental federation is: 1. Fractures of material and retention 2. Marginal adaptation 3. Occlusal contour and wear 4. Proximal anatomical form 5. Patient's view Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

Biological Properties of restorations

时间窗: Three years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI (International Dental Federation) world dental federation is: 1. Post-operative (hyper-sensitivity) and tooth vitality 2. Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction 3. Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures) 4. Periodontal 5. Adjacent Mucosa 6. Oral and General Health Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验