Blended Learning Versus Face-to-face Learning in Cardiac Physiotherapy Students
- Conditions
- StudentsLearning
- Interventions
- Other: Face-to-face learning groupOther: Blended-learning group
- Registration Number
- NCT05547009
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Valencia
- Brief Summary
Blended learning (BL) combines both face-to-face learning (FL) and online learning. There is no evidence about the effects of a BL program in cardiac physiotherapy education. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of a BL program versus a FL program in Physiotherapy Degree students on knowledge, competencies, satisfaction, perceptions, usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours. An assessor-blinded randomized trial was performed.
- Detailed Description
Blended learning (BL) combines both face-to-face learning (FL) and online learning. There is no evidence about the effects of a BL program in cardiac physiotherapy education. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of a BL program versus a FL program in Physiotherapy Degree students on knowledge, competencies, satisfaction, perceptions, usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours. An assessor-blinded randomized trial was performed. A total of 100 students were randomly allocated to a BL group (BLG, n=48), or a FL group (FLG, n=52). The BLG received face-to-face classes plus online re-sources (online syllabus, Moodle, scientific-based videos and websites, activities, glossary, and apps). The FLG received face-to-face classes and hardcopy resources (hardcopy syl-labus, scientific-based information, activities, and glossary). Knowledge, ethical and gen-der competencies, satisfaction, and perceptions were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours were assessed post-intervention.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Being a student of Degree in Physiotherapy at the University of Valencia.
- Willing to participate
- Previous cardiac physiotherapy training.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Face-to-face learning group Face-to-face learning group Face-to-face classes. Blended-learning group Blended-learning group The BL program included paced, asynchronous online learning modules and scheduled online activities with strategic face-to-face lectures.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knowledge acquisition 5 minutes Multiple-choice test. Score from 0 to 10 .The higher the score, the greater the knowledge.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Students' attitudes towards e-learning and e-learning behaviour 5 minutes Questionnaire comprising 3 items (how much Moodle helped you, willingness of using Moodle, interest in e-learning). The higher score, the greater attitudes towards e-learning and e-learning behaviour.
Cross-curricular ethical and gender competencies 5 minute Higher Education, Transversal Skills and Gender Questionnaire. From 1 to 42. The higher the score, the more ethical and gender competencies are acquired.
Perceptions and evaluation of the program 5 minutes 8-item Kavadella's Perceptions Questionnaire. From 1 to 40 points. The higher the score, the better the perceptions and evaluation of the program.
Satisfaction with the program 5 minute 6-item Yang's Satisfaction Questionnaire. From 1 to 24. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction with the program.
Usability of the virtual platform 5 minutes System Usability Scale. The total SUS score (0 to 100) can be interpreted as not acceptable (0-64), acceptable (65 to 84), or excellent (85 to 100)
Blended-learning acceptance 5 minutes 4-item Blended Learning Acceptance Scale. From 1 to 28 points. The higher the score, the greater the acceptance.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Valencia
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain