MedPath

Blended Learning Versus Face-to-face Learning in Cardiac Physiotherapy Students

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Students
Learning
Interventions
Other: Face-to-face learning group
Other: Blended-learning group
Registration Number
NCT05547009
Lead Sponsor
University of Valencia
Brief Summary

Blended learning (BL) combines both face-to-face learning (FL) and online learning. There is no evidence about the effects of a BL program in cardiac physiotherapy education. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of a BL program versus a FL program in Physiotherapy Degree students on knowledge, competencies, satisfaction, perceptions, usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours. An assessor-blinded randomized trial was performed.

Detailed Description

Blended learning (BL) combines both face-to-face learning (FL) and online learning. There is no evidence about the effects of a BL program in cardiac physiotherapy education. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of a BL program versus a FL program in Physiotherapy Degree students on knowledge, competencies, satisfaction, perceptions, usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours. An assessor-blinded randomized trial was performed. A total of 100 students were randomly allocated to a BL group (BLG, n=48), or a FL group (FLG, n=52). The BLG received face-to-face classes plus online re-sources (online syllabus, Moodle, scientific-based videos and websites, activities, glossary, and apps). The FLG received face-to-face classes and hardcopy resources (hardcopy syl-labus, scientific-based information, activities, and glossary). Knowledge, ethical and gen-der competencies, satisfaction, and perceptions were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Usability, BL acceptance, attitudes and behaviours were assessed post-intervention.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Being a student of Degree in Physiotherapy at the University of Valencia.
  • Willing to participate
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous cardiac physiotherapy training.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Face-to-face learning groupFace-to-face learning groupFace-to-face classes.
Blended-learning groupBlended-learning groupThe BL program included paced, asynchronous online learning modules and scheduled online activities with strategic face-to-face lectures.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Knowledge acquisition5 minutes

Multiple-choice test. Score from 0 to 10 .The higher the score, the greater the knowledge.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Students' attitudes towards e-learning and e-learning behaviour5 minutes

Questionnaire comprising 3 items (how much Moodle helped you, willingness of using Moodle, interest in e-learning). The higher score, the greater attitudes towards e-learning and e-learning behaviour.

Cross-curricular ethical and gender competencies5 minute

Higher Education, Transversal Skills and Gender Questionnaire. From 1 to 42. The higher the score, the more ethical and gender competencies are acquired.

Perceptions and evaluation of the program5 minutes

8-item Kavadella's Perceptions Questionnaire. From 1 to 40 points. The higher the score, the better the perceptions and evaluation of the program.

Satisfaction with the program5 minute

6-item Yang's Satisfaction Questionnaire. From 1 to 24. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction with the program.

Usability of the virtual platform5 minutes

System Usability Scale. The total SUS score (0 to 100) can be interpreted as not acceptable (0-64), acceptable (65 to 84), or excellent (85 to 100)

Blended-learning acceptance5 minutes

4-item Blended Learning Acceptance Scale. From 1 to 28 points. The higher the score, the greater the acceptance.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Valencia

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath