MedPath

Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to Suxamethonium During ECT on the Sensitization to NMBA and the Development of Protective Antibodies

Conditions
Mania
Depression
Hallucinations
Registration Number
NCT05210062
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions in France are Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). The mechanism of immunization to NMBA is not yet understood.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020.

ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available.

Detailed Description

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions are different types of Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). Anaphylactic reactions are classically described as IgE-dependent, triggered by the allergen which, by bridging specific IgE antibodies on the surface of mast cells and basophils, induces a massive release, in particular of histamine, which is responsible for the symptoms. Other immunological mechanisms, in particular by specific IgGs, have been described. The mechanism of immunization to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) is not yet understood. The quaternary ammonium group (AQ) is the common epitope of NMBA recognized by IgE. Due to the absence of previous exposure to NMBA reported in 50% of patients with HSA-PA to NMBA, other substances carrying substituted AQ ions are suspected of inducing cross-sensitization, such as household cleaners, cosmetics or drug (pholcodine). However, the sensitizing role of NMBA themselves is not established, and no study has analyzed iterative exposure to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) as a sensitizing factor.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020.

ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available.

A single patient group is planned in this study, consisting of patients with a medical indication for ECT for psychiatric pathologies resistant to medical treatment (depression, mania, hallucinatory episode in particular). The study will take place in two parts: a preliminary phase "phase P" in 10 patients (with previous exposure to ECT) and a "phase E" study phase in 60 patients. For phase E, only patients with first-time access to ECT or without ECT in the previous ten years will be eligible.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient requiring iterative exposure to ECT as part of their psychiatric pathology in one of the investigator center
  • Patient who has not had ECT in the last 10 years for the phase E group, regardless of their previous ECT exposure for the phase P group
  • Patient who has been informed and has signed the consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Absence of written informed consent
  • Allergies identified specifically to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA)
  • Patient under tutelage, curatorship or judicial protection
  • Patient without social security
  • Contraindication to ECT : intracranial hypertension, intracranial lesions without intracranial hypertension, recent episode of cerebral hemorrhage, recent myocardial infarction or embologenic disease, presence of aneurysms or vascular malformations at risk of hemorrhage, retinal detachment, pheochromocytoma, history of ineffective treatment with ECT having had serious side effects, taking anticoagulant treatments

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluate the development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium (type IgG4 anti-suxamethonium) after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium

Incidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium assessed by the presence of specific anti-suxamethonium IgG4 antibodies (via ImmunoCAP method) following iterative exposure to ECT after 10 weeks.10 weeks

Incidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Development of specific IgE antibodies

Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Development of specific IgG antibodies

Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Development of specific IgG4 antibodies

Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Development of specific IgG4 antibodies

Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratioIgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of polarization of memory T cells before and after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks via flow cytometry after re-stimulation with NMBA.10 weeks

Evolution of polarization of memory T cells

Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgE.18 months

Cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgE.

Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgG.18 months

Cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgG.

Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Development of specific IgG antibodies

Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Development of specific IgE antibodies

Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) before the first exposure to ECT.Week 0

Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors

Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors

Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 10 weeks since the last exposure to ECT.10 weeks

Persistence of antibodies detected at 10 weeks

Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 6 months since the last exposure to ECT.6 months

Persistence of antibodies detected at 6 months

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Development of specific IgE antibodies

Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.6 months

Incidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Levels of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 months

Levels of specific IgE antibodies

Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Development of specific IgG antibodies

Describe the antibody profile before exposure to NMBA, and the potential link with previous drug exposures in the previous year of antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.18 months

Antibody profile before exposure to NMBA and the potential link with previous drug exposures in the previous year

Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Levels of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 months

Levels of specific IgG4 antibodies

Cytokine profile, particularly pro-tolerogenic, and development of Tregs lymphocytes.18 months

Profile of cyrokine

Risk factors: number of ECT sessions, exposure to pholcodine before or during the study, occupational exposure to quaternary ammoniums (hairdressers, cleaning agents, beauticians).18 months

Risk factors

Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 0.Week 0

Assay of hormones

Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Development of specific IgG4 antibodies

Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio

Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 10.Week 10

Assay of hormones

Evaluate the influence of hormonal changes induced by ECT on immunization.18 months

Influence of hormonal changes on immunization

Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeks

Incidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Exposures of the previous year to antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.18 months

Previous exposure to antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.6 months

Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium 6 months.6 months

Incidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).

Levels of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 months

Levels of specific IgG antibodies

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Saint-Antoine Hospital

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Saint-Antoine Hospital
🇫🇷Paris, France
Florian FERRERI
Contact
01 49 28 26 35
florian.ferreri@aphp.fr

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.