跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06398860
NCT06398860Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Effectiveness- and Cost Effectiveness of a Structured Method for Systematic and Integrated Occupational Safety and Health and Patient Safety Management Systems (SIOHPS) - a Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Region Västmanland2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 750 人开始时间: 2024年7月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
入组人数
750
试验地点
2
主要终点
Quality of care

研究概览

简要总结

The evidence unequivocally supports the association between work environment and patient safety. The negative impact of working conditions on both employee health and quality of care highlights the potential benefits of integrating these areas. It is therefore suggested that integrated systematic occupational health and patient safety management are crucial in managing the challenges faced by healthcare services today.

The project aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured method for systematic and integrated occupational safety and health and patient safety management systems (SIOHPS). A process evaluation will be conducted alongside the main study to determine the intervention's specific outcomes and provide transferable guidance to a wider context. The intervention is designed to support both systematic occupational health and patient safety management systems using a Safety II-perspective. The intervention is comprised of several core components, including education to staff, support-functions and management, daily team reflections; as well as audit and feedback.

A stepped wedge cluster-controlled design (SWD) will be used, with workplaces as clusters. The SWD will consist of three steps, with four clusters crossing over from the control to the intervention group at each step. All clusters will start as controls. At least twelve healthcare units with at least thirty employees per workplace from two different regions in Sweden will participate in the intervention. Workplaces that provide round-the-clock care are invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria are units with plans to implement any other occupational health and/or patient safety improvement work during the project period. At the individual level, inclusion criteria for employees include at least 50% of full-time work at the workplace.

The SIOHPS project will contribute to the existing theory on safety culture interventions by considering the integration of these areas. The goal is to contribute to a safe environment for both employees and patients.

详细描述

The increasing and aging populations, changing patient needs and advances in technology present significant challenges to healthcare systems around the world. These challenges are particularly demanding in complex systems associated with high risks, such as the healthcare. In addition to the suffering experienced by patients, preventable adverse events can result in increased loading and costs to the hospitals and challenges in the healthcare work environment. Over the years, reports of poor working conditions in the healthcare sector, characterized by high workload and stress have been raised. Previous studies have shown an association between the work environment and employees´ health, as well as patient outcomes. The evidence unequivocally supports the association between the work environment and patient safety. The negative impact of working conditions on both employee health and the quality of care highlights the potential benefits of integrating these areas. Swedish occupational safety and health legislation and the Patient Safety Act require employers to provide good, safe care and to conduct risk assessments to prevent risks and injuries in the healthcare sector. Consequently, it is proposed that integrated systematic occupational health and patient safety management are crucial in managing the challenges faced by healthcare services today. However, there is a lack of research-based tools and methods to evaluate the impact of integrated systematic occupational health and patient safety management on quality and safety. Moreover, it is essential to evaluate the process of developing, implementing, and utilizing a new tool and method.

The project aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured method for systematic and integrated occupational safety and health and patient safety management systems (SIOHPS). A process evaluation will be conducted alongside the main study to determine the intervention's specific outcomes and provide transferable guidance to a wider context.

The intervention is designed to support both systematic occupational health and patient safety management systems (Safety I) including a Safety II-perspective, i.e. bringing into focus situations where safety is actually present, that is, in everyday work that usually goes well. The content of the intervention is based on the Safer Culture Framework, Swedish regulations related to the field, and current evidence of effective interventions to improve safety culture in healthcare organizations. The intervention is comprised of several core components such as targeted education, daily team reflections and support for systematic management.

First, a two hour education will be conducted for management, health care workers (HCW) involved in patient safety work, safety representatives and intervention facilitators. The education includes information on 1) occupational health and safety as well as patient safety, concepts and systematic management systems, 2) safety culture and psychological safety, 3) demonstration of the content of the intervention including the supporting digital tool and 4) case discussions. All HCW will take part of a short version of the education (approximately 30 minutes) with similar content. The education sessions will be delivered to each cluster close to intervention start. The second core component is a short daily team reflection conducted by HCW at the unit in connection to the end of work shifts. These are standardized to support identification of situations at work related to both Safety I and II perspective for both occupational health and patient safety as well as learning. The facilitator supports the HCW in the process of the daily reflections to maintain adherence and sustainability. The third component includes risk assessment, planning and implementation of appropriate measures, follow-up and feedback, based on information identified in the second component. The steps in this component targets the management and should be conducted in close collaboration with HCW involved in patient safety work and the safety representatives. Participation of HCW in this part is encouraged.

The project is guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions and is coproduced with stakeholders. A program theory guides the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. The study has a hybrid Type I design in which the primary aim is to determine effectiveness of an intervention with the secondary aim to better understand context for implementation and evaluate the process.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Individual staff needs to work at least 50% at the workplace
  • Workplace provides 24-hour care

排除标准

  • Plan to implement another method for conduction daily work environment and/or patient safety work during the project period
  • Units providing pediatric and psychiatric care

结局指标

主要结局

Quality of care

时间窗: 12 months

Readmission rate within 30-days of discharge. Register data.

Sick leave

时间窗: 12 months

Total number of sick leave days after intervention start. Register data.

次要结局

  • Job demands(4, 8 months)
  • Work Engagement(4, 8 months)
  • Short-term sick leave(12 months)
  • Productivity loss(4, 8 months)
  • Learning environment(4, 8 months)
  • Work environment(4, 8 months)
  • Health(4, 8 months)
  • Patient Safety(4, 8 months)
  • Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER): Sick leave and Quality of care(4 months before first intervention enrollment to 8 months after last intervention enrollment)
  • Job resources(4, 8 months)
  • Safety climate(4, 8 months)
  • Quality of care(4, 8 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Malin Lohela Karlsson

Associate professor

Region Västmanland

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验