Comparison of two anesthetic gels at maxillary posterior teeth extraction.

Phase 4

• Conditions: Pain Threshold; F02.463.593.710.560

• Registration Number: RBR-36bxjx
• Lead Sponsor: niversidade Federal de Sergipe

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2016-12-05
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruitment completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Individuals treated at the Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe ; of both genders; in the age range 18-60 Years of Age; sign an Informed Consent Form; Need of bilateral upper molars extraction

Exclusion Criteria

History of allergy or other problems arising from the use of any components of the formulations to be employed; History of methemoglobinemia; Alcoholics and toxic users; Fear of dentist; Pregnancy.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The Liposomal lidocaine/prilocaine hydrogel proved to be better than non-lipossomal lidocaine/prilocaine hydrogel and sufficient to promote anesthesia on palatal mucosa allowing realization of the fully procedure of upper-molar extraction without any pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
onger anesthetic duration in the group with liposome-associated anesthetic gel.<br><br>Evaluated by the use of needles in the palate periodically, until the patient report pain.