MedPath

Neurobiological Principles Applied to the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Drug: Carbidopa-Levodopa
Other: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Other: Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Drug: Placebo
Other: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Training
Registration Number
NCT00715520
Lead Sponsor
Emory University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to use (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) TMS or drugs to improve learning of movement skills and the adaptation processes in patients after stroke. Once investigators have determined the improving effect of TMS and the drugs on learning of movement skills, the study team may be able to provide information that improves rehabilitative treatment and helps to improve recovery after stroke.

Detailed Description

Previous studies have shown, that when patients learn a new motor movement, it may cause a change in the way the nerves act in the area of the brain that controls movement. This change is called use-dependent plasticity. The ability of that part of the brain, called the motor cortex (M1), to reorganize plays a major role in the recovery of motor deficits post-stroke; hence the importance for further development of rehabilitative strategies that utilize this potential for recovery. In this proposed study, investigators will further examine influences of use-dependent plasticity in the non-injured M1 of healthy subjects and injured M1 of stroke subjects using a combination of non-invasive cortical stimulation, medication, and exercise techniques. In Aim 1, investigators will test the effect of drugs that interact specifically with different neurotransmitter systems on use-dependent plasticity in intact M1 of healthy humans. In Aim 2, investigators will identify the parameters for non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 that are most effective to enhance use-dependent plasticity in intact healthy human M1. In Aim 3, investigators will test the drugs and rTMS protocols that were demonstrated to be most effective to enhance use- dependent plasticity in the Specific Aim 1 and 2 and apply them to participants who have experienced a stroke. Results from this study will help to inform future research about the efficacy of plasticity enhancing methods in injured M1 of stroke patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
33
Inclusion Criteria
  • Normal neurological examination
  • Ability to meet criteria of inclusion experiment
  • Ability to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • History or neurological or psychiatric disease
  • Abnormal MRI of brain
  • Abnormal neuropsychological testing
  • Intake of CNS active drugs
  • History of seizure disorder
  • History of migraine headaches
  • History of anaphylaxis or allergic reactions
  • Contraindication to TMS

Aim 3:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebral ischemic infarction more than 6 months prior to entering the study
  • Single lesion as defined by MRI of the brain affecting the primary motor output system of the hand at a cortical (M1) level or subcortical level, or unilateral, and supratentorial in absence of history of a previous symptomatic stroke within 3 months of the current stroke
  • Dense paresis of the hand for more than three days after cerebral infarction (MRC of < 4- of wrist- and finger extension/flexion movements)
  • Good functional recovery of hand function as defined by MRC of 4 or 4+ of wrist- and finger extension/flexion movements
  • Ability to perform wrist extension movements
  • Ability to meet criteria of inclusion experiment
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Ability of TMS to elicit a measurable MEP of > 100 μV and an increase in MEP amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity (up to 100% of MSO) of at least 20% over MEP amplitude at MT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or neurological or psychiatric disease, including bipolar disorder
  • Intake of CNS active drugs
  • History of seizure disorder
  • History of migraine headaches
  • History of anaphylaxis or allergic reactions
  • Contraindication to TMS

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Aim 1Carbidopa-LevodopaHealthy adult female and male subjects will receive study drugs and TMS training to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 1Amphetamine SulfateHealthy adult female and male subjects will receive study drugs and TMS training to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 1PlaceboHealthy adult female and male subjects will receive study drugs and TMS training to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 1Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) TrainingHealthy adult female and male subjects will receive study drugs and TMS training to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 2Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)Healthy adult female and male subjects will receive repetitive TMS (rTMS) at different times or frequencies with respect to the training movement or sham stimulation.
Aim 2Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)Healthy adult female and male subjects will receive repetitive TMS (rTMS) at different times or frequencies with respect to the training movement or sham stimulation.
Aim 3Carbidopa-LevodopaFemale and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 3Amphetamine SulfateFemale and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 3PlaceboFemale and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 3Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)Female and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 3Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) TrainingFemale and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 1MethylphenidateHealthy adult female and male subjects will receive study drugs and TMS training to measure M1 excitability.
Aim 3MethylphenidateFemale and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction, will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.

Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean sum of normalized MEP for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect to the pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in mV. Long- lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.

Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean sum of normalized MEP for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo at 0.1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning.

Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean peak acceleration of wrist movements for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect of the TMS pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.

Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean peak acceleration for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.

Aim 3: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.

Aim 3: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)

Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Emory University School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath