MedPath

Outcome of TKA Using Customized Cutting Block Compared With Conventional Intramedullary Cutting Guide

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Procedure: Standard knee cutting guides
Procedure: Patient specific cutting guides
Registration Number
NCT02128464
Lead Sponsor
Thammasat University
Brief Summary

Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of OA knee patients.

Detailed Description

Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of osteoarthritic knee patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
108
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 60-90
  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee and qualify for surgery, as indicated by one of the following:
  • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved;
  • Correction of varus or valgus.
  • Willing to participate and return for follow-up study visits.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Vascular insufficiency
  • Previous deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
  • Previous osteotomy
  • Previous patella fracture or surgery
  • Previous healed tibia or femur fractures
  • Previous joint replacement surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard knee cutting guidesStandard knee cutting guidesStandard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.
Patient specific cutting guidesPatient specific cutting guidesPatient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mechanical Axis Alignment (Absolute Value Measured in Degrees) Using 3 Feet Long Leg Films3 Months Post-operative

Femoral Valgus Angle, Tibial varus angle, Tibial slope, Femoral Flexsion/Extension angle, Implant Rotation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Blood volume in suction drainPost-operative Day 2
Operative timeDuring the procedure
Hemoglobin levelPost-operative day1, 2, 3
WOMAC score1 year
Intraoperative BleedingIntra-operative

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thammasat University Hospital.

🇹🇭

Pathumthani, Thailand

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath